My wife just bought me a YTS-62
.
While deciding what to get, I spent a while comparing options in about that price range. In particular, the YTS-62 and the T901.
I've only been playing a couple of years so my opinions are not at all expert, but for what it's worth, here's what I thought.
1. Appearance: Well, they are both beautiful. Actually, I think almost all saxophones are beautiful so I'm not terribly discriminating - not the vibrant blue ebay saxes, but anything in the standard colours looks great to me. The Yani has slightly darker lacquer which I preferred but not by much.
2. Weight. The Yamaha is a little heavier. I have read that many people prefer this but hefting the weight of a tenor is a downside of playing the instrument for me (weak wrists) so for me this was a negative. Again, only a slight one.
3. Keywork. Pretty similar. The key pearls on the Yani felt a bit nicer under the fingers (maybe plastic vs real? not sure I can tell and I didn't think about looking closely/asking until after the fact). I really liked the action on both of these, but for me the Yamaha has a feeling of precision which gave it a noticeable edge over the Yani. There was a small technical problem with the T901; when going to the high G, say from an A, there was often a slight lag in the octave mechanism - I could see it hesitating - which caused some odd squeaks. At first I thought this was me but then I spotted the lag. Presumably this would be easy to fix and applied only to this specific saxophone.
4. Tone. I thought the Yani was warmer in the lower register but I liked the higher notes on the Yamaha better. Overall the sound on the Yamaha seemed crisper to me - I think I've read descriptions of this being a "centred" or "focused" sound which didn't mean anything to me until I tried it. Now I understand what this means but I don't know if it's much help to anyone who hasn't heard it for themselves.
The price I got on the Yamaha was about 10% cheaper than the best price I found on the Yanagisawa but this may vary from place to place.
In the end I went for the Yamaha but it was not a straightforward decision and I'm sure I could have been happy with the T901. I spoke to an excellent local tech who said that from his point of view both are quality horns, but the parts for the Yamaha are easier to get which makes repairs cheaper.
The things that tipped the decision for me were the overall tone and the feeling of precision in the keywork of the Yamaha.
Incidentally I also tried a Keilworth - the EX90 I think it was - and found it much too heavy, plus I didn't really like the keywork. I have been exclusively playing Asian (Taiwanese) saxophones up to now so maybe that was just a familiarity thing. I also tried a P.Mauriat - Le Bravo or something similar - which I didn't think was up to the standard of the others in terms of the action or the tone, but to be fair I think that is marketed as a student model.
I also had the chance to try several different mouthpieces on the T901. I'd tried different mouthpieces before when choosing my current one (a Meyer 7M) but the experience of trying different saxophones on the same mouthpiece, followed immediately by different mouthpieces on the same saxophone, really brought home the point which I have read repeatedly about this - changing mouthpieces made MUCH more difference to the sound than changing saxophones. Changing the fleshy bit attached to the mouthpiece also made quite a difference, of course...
While deciding what to get, I spent a while comparing options in about that price range. In particular, the YTS-62 and the T901.
I've only been playing a couple of years so my opinions are not at all expert, but for what it's worth, here's what I thought.
1. Appearance: Well, they are both beautiful. Actually, I think almost all saxophones are beautiful so I'm not terribly discriminating - not the vibrant blue ebay saxes, but anything in the standard colours looks great to me. The Yani has slightly darker lacquer which I preferred but not by much.
2. Weight. The Yamaha is a little heavier. I have read that many people prefer this but hefting the weight of a tenor is a downside of playing the instrument for me (weak wrists) so for me this was a negative. Again, only a slight one.
3. Keywork. Pretty similar. The key pearls on the Yani felt a bit nicer under the fingers (maybe plastic vs real? not sure I can tell and I didn't think about looking closely/asking until after the fact). I really liked the action on both of these, but for me the Yamaha has a feeling of precision which gave it a noticeable edge over the Yani. There was a small technical problem with the T901; when going to the high G, say from an A, there was often a slight lag in the octave mechanism - I could see it hesitating - which caused some odd squeaks. At first I thought this was me but then I spotted the lag. Presumably this would be easy to fix and applied only to this specific saxophone.
4. Tone. I thought the Yani was warmer in the lower register but I liked the higher notes on the Yamaha better. Overall the sound on the Yamaha seemed crisper to me - I think I've read descriptions of this being a "centred" or "focused" sound which didn't mean anything to me until I tried it. Now I understand what this means but I don't know if it's much help to anyone who hasn't heard it for themselves.
The price I got on the Yamaha was about 10% cheaper than the best price I found on the Yanagisawa but this may vary from place to place.
In the end I went for the Yamaha but it was not a straightforward decision and I'm sure I could have been happy with the T901. I spoke to an excellent local tech who said that from his point of view both are quality horns, but the parts for the Yamaha are easier to get which makes repairs cheaper.
The things that tipped the decision for me were the overall tone and the feeling of precision in the keywork of the Yamaha.
Incidentally I also tried a Keilworth - the EX90 I think it was - and found it much too heavy, plus I didn't really like the keywork. I have been exclusively playing Asian (Taiwanese) saxophones up to now so maybe that was just a familiarity thing. I also tried a P.Mauriat - Le Bravo or something similar - which I didn't think was up to the standard of the others in terms of the action or the tone, but to be fair I think that is marketed as a student model.
I also had the chance to try several different mouthpieces on the T901. I'd tried different mouthpieces before when choosing my current one (a Meyer 7M) but the experience of trying different saxophones on the same mouthpiece, followed immediately by different mouthpieces on the same saxophone, really brought home the point which I have read repeatedly about this - changing mouthpieces made MUCH more difference to the sound than changing saxophones. Changing the fleshy bit attached to the mouthpiece also made quite a difference, of course...