Sax on the Web Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

Weights of Soprano Saxophones

8.4K views 85 replies 18 participants last post by  SteveS  
#1 ·
In the last day or two, I’ve done a lot of research on reasons for right thumb pain and thankfully to the more seasoned saxophonists here, found a solution.
The Lagen thumb rest modification.

Apparently manufacturers make these thumb rests low which creates extra pressure on the right thumb, particularly the straight playing ones. Yes I realize there are curved saxophones but I truly prefer the straight kinds.

Before discovering this solution, one question that plagued me was the weight of the instrument. I believe mine is 2.86 / 1.3 pounds which doesn’t seem too heavy.

Then I started reading other models of saxophones that members were discussing. One of these popular models I researched only to discover that it was 7.70 pounds.

This information shocks me. There’s almost a 5 lb. difference.

It made me wonder about the weights of other soprano saxophones, particularly the straight models.

How much does your soprano saxophone weigh and what type is it?
 
#7 ·
I guess you meant grams.
That’s an old saxophone.
From that chart it appears that most saxophones are between 2 to 3 pounds. Maybe the weight of the soprano saxophone was a typo error cause 7.70 pounds is excessive.
 
#3 · (Edited)
Jupiter 749, straight 1 piece body: 1230g ~ 2.7 lbs
Yanagisawa SC880, curved, removable neck: 1270g ~ 2.8 lbs
Selmer S-III, removable neck: 1420g ~ 3.1 lbs with straight neck
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saxluvr
Save
#10 ·
Use a neck strap to support the weight, and a bent neck to attain the correct mouthpiece angle.

Been there, done that.

Of course, I have osteoarthritis in my left thumb, and there’s not much getting around that when it hurts.
 
Save
#14 ·
I did a quick search for weights as I am interested in any difference, I will weigh my MK VI, Couff Superba II, YSS61 and Jupiter 847. Add to this list if you like.
Soprano weights.

Adolfe Sax 1860 - .55
Amati 3286 - 1.33
Antigua SS4920LQ 2009: 1.320 Kg. = 2.910 lb.
Antigua Winds 586-BC-1270 grams -2.8 lb
Antigua A590LQ 2lbs 15oz / 1.332 kg
Antigua 3286 96 - 1.29
Brogani - 1.35
Buescher TT 1926 (206xxx) 1.18 kg 2 lb 9.5oz
Buescher TT 1928: 1.260 Kg. = 2.777 lb.
Buffet S1 82 - 1.45
B&S - 2 pounds 13 oz
B&S Series 1000 96 -1.26
Cannon Ball Arc -1.50
Conn PanAm 1920 - .99
Couf Superba - 2 lbs 10.7ounces
Couson - 1.13
Eastman ECS - 1.36
Jupiter Artist Sop. 3lb
Keilwerth     SX90    1.356 kg   = 2.990 lbs
King Margigaux SML 78 - 1.22
P.Mauriat gebogen - 1.35
Preston Gerade - 1.60
Rampone R1 Jazz (sterling silver) - 1,510 grams
Selmer SA80II 1992 - 3 lbs 0.4 oz
Mark VI - 1.194 kilograms -- 2.6 lbs.
Mark VI Selmer 1977 - 1.205Grams - 2 Pounds 10.5oz
Yamaha YSS475 - 1.52kgs--3.26lbs
Yamaha YSS-61 SN- 17XX- 2 lb 9.5 oz.
Yamaha YSS62 - 1.278 kg  - 2.818 lbs
Yamaha YSS-675 - 1.47
Yamaha YSS-875 - 1.47
Yamaha 875-EX 06 - 2lb 12.5 oz - 1261 grams
Yanagisawa S6 1975: 1.265 Kg. = 2.788 lb.
Yanagisawa S880 Elimona: 1.260 kg = 2.777 lbs.
Yanagisawa S901  1.292 kg   = 2.848 lbs
Yanagisawa S992 ~ 1.361 Kg - 3 lb
Yanagisawa SC992 ~ 1.361 Kg - 3 lb
Yanagisawa SC901 ~ 1.361 Kg -3 lb
Thormann TSS-350 - 1.40
Vito sop (SN 27635xx) (Yani S-6 ) 2 lb 12 oz (1.26 kg)
 
#16 ·
I did a quick search for weights as I am interested in any difference, I will weigh my MK VI, Couff Superba II, YSS61 and Jupiter 847. Add to this list if you like.
Soprano weights.
Very confusing list, as you've got some weights indicated using kg only (and unlabeled) some using lbs only, some with both, some with fractional lbs indicated as ounces, some with fractional lbs in decimal form, etc.

Using consistent units (whichever you prefer) would make for a much more usable list.
 
#20 ·
Put it in the list. Since the weights are done on different horns, with different scales observed by different people you will get different weights. The difference is .044 maybe the other guy rounded up?

Feel free to adjust the list or create a spreadsheet it appears you know what needs to be done. Americans don't use metric in Canada we use metric 1st but are fluent in both systems.
Cheers
 
#18 ·
My Mk VI alto is less than 7 lbs.
 
Save
#31 ·
This is why the US does not use metric: Administratium


"Investigators at a major research institution have discovered the heaviest element known to science. This startling new discovery has been tentatively named Administratium (Ad). This new element has no protons or electrons, thus having an atomic number of 0. It does, however, have 1 neutron, 125 assistant neutrons, 75 vice neutrons, and 111 assistant vice neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by a force called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons. Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be detected as it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. According to the discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium causes one reaction to take over four days to complete when it would normally take less than a second.

Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years; it does not decay but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons, vice neutrons, and assistant vice neutrons exchange places.

In fact an Administratium sample's mass will actually increase over time, since with each reorganization some of the morons inevitably become neutrons, forming new isotopes. This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to speculate that Administratium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as the "Critical Morass.""
-Stolen from the Interwebs
 
Save
#36 ·
Only in the US you can buy a 8 ounce drink. The same drink is available in a 1 L bottle. And you pay for it with US currency that’s metric.

I wonder if the weight differences are with and without the mouthpiece ?
 
#37 ·
I wonder about mass differences between mouthpieces of 3D printed polymer vs osmium.

Which is shinier?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PigSquealer
Save
#40 ·
I’m not quite sure I understand your question.
I think the pain is induced due to the thumb rest being too low. From being on the site for a few days I’ve learned that it’s a common problem for many soprano players which is probably why there are so many solutions. Anyway I’m getting a new YSS82ZR. It has a curved neck. . I’m going to use my alto neck strap and purchase a Lagen thumb rest so I have more more hand room. I think these improvements will make a big difference .

These guys make some nice plastic moulded mouthpieces that come in some very cool colours.

 
#47 ·
Yes!
Just weighed my 1974 YSS-61 without the mouthpiece on a digital food scale and it is 2.46 lbs or 1.12 kg.
That’s quite light. How long have you had the YSS - 61 and do you like it? I wonder if the YAS-62 is similar to the YSS -61. I’ve read that the ‘62’s are difficult to purchase caste nobody wants to part with them.

Also, on a side note; I wonder why there are so many Yamaha bashers on the site. Maybe it’s just sales competition. From my experience my Japans saxophones have all played much better than my vintage from Paris, France but to each their own.
 
#44 ·
As a professional scientist but strictly amateur cook, amateur musician, I agree that the half, quarter, 1/16, etc, "English" system of weights and measures is archaic.

I hope that when the US finally fully converts to metric, that we can also change the octave from base-2 to base-10, and get rid of half, quarter, eighth notes. Decimal time signatures are sure to clean up much musical confusion.
 
#45 ·
#48 · (Edited)
I have had the YSS-61 for about 3 weeks it is in pristine condition bought from the original owner at a very reasonable price a beautiful Purple Logo horn. It has excellent key work but I am learning to master it as it does not have a top front F key which I assume contributes to its lightness.
I am practicing alternate fingerings on it. The YSS-61 is much lighter than my Jupiter JPS-847-G which is being overhauled at present that horn is a bit of a pig.

I think the YSS-61 is lighter than my MK VI and I have a Couff Superba II in for an adjustment and service it has some odd key ergonomics as well.

I play a lot of soprano gigs so the horns pay for themselves.

There are 62s and SX90s that come up fairly frequently for sale across Canada I am waiting for a nice Purple Logo 62.
 
#49 ·
Congratulations !
I wish I’d found a nice YSS-62. Missing the high F wouldn’t bother me much as I rarely use it.
You just answered my question regarding the weight. It’s something I never thought about.
Are you are professional sax player?
That’s a lot of instruments.
Where do you buy your second hand instruments? Do you get a chance to play them before you buy? I’ve never purchased an instrument before trying it which is why I’m so apprehensive about purchasing 2nd hand online.
 
#50 ·
The weight of a soprano is greatly influenced by the padsaver being present inside the horn or not. The same turns out to be the case for playability. Sopranos with 2 necks also tend to be slightly heavier than those with only one neck, at least for the total gross weight.
 
#51 ·
I don't use a pad saver I don't believe it is recommended as it holds moisture and corrodes the barrel of the horn there are likely divergent thoughts on this.
The YSS-61 came with one in it, I pulled it out and won't be putting it back in.
JPS 847 does have two solid silver necks but it is a very heavily made horn.
 
#54 ·
Ok I was wrong. I’ve always had one of those but I don’t keep it in the saxophone. In fact I don’t even use them any more. After playing I clean and dry it and leave it on a shelf, where it won’t get knocked over, to air dry until the next time I play.
Thanks
 
#72 ·
I've some comments:

1) I'd take all those reported weights with a block of salt given that most people don't have the foggiest idea how to make an accurate measurement. Two Buescher True Tone sopranos with 180g difference sounds bogus to me. Your bathroom scale with 240 lb range is NOT going to give you accurate weights to +/- 10g, especially if you just rest the horn on it. For things that weigh around 1.5 kgf, you need a scale with a range of something like 10 or 20 kgf, not a bathroom scale, and not a kitchen scale that goes up to 1000 g and you're overloading it and reading the dial on the second time around.

2) Most RH thumb hooks on clarinet and soprano sax are too low for someone with normal hands. Take a look at the anatomy of your hand (apparently many instrument designers never do this). When the hand's curved in a natural form, your thumb is across from your index finger, not somewhere down below the middle finger. Collapse the thumb down under there and right off the bat you're severely weakening the abiility of the thumb to hold something. Unfortunately most soprano saxophones have the alternate F# key right where the thumb needs to go. Thus, the ergonomic superiority of the Buescher/Martin layout with the up-and-down alt F# key, so there's not that tone hole back there. Unfortunately even those makes persisted in the weird under-the-middle-finger positioning of the thumbhook, but if you have a Buescher or Martin you can unsolder that thing and put it where it ought to be.

3) The whole problem is exacerbated when players hold the straight soprano down like a clarinet. 'Tain't a clarinet. It's a saxophone. Hold it OUT, nearly horizontal, so the saxophone mouthpiece interacts with you LIKE a saxophone mouthpiece. Now, the weight of the horn is being supported by your right thumb in the "gripping/clamping" direction, which is enormously strong, rather than the "pushing sideways upward" direction, whicih is the very weakest direction for the thumb to act. Holding the soprano sax like this will also improve tone and response, especially on low notes. Whenever I find I'm having low note response difficulties on soprano, I always realize I'm letting the thing sag.

The neck strap seems like a good idea, but a straight horn and a neck strap doesn't work; the neck strap will run right across the back of your left hand. Plus see my notes on embouchure. But if you put a seriously curved neck on a straight horn (I can't do this because I don't own a two piece soprano), then you'd essentially be playing a curved soprano from the low D on up, and the neck would get the thing away from your body. I have not seen many (any?) really curved necks on otherwise straight horns; it seems like they're either straight, or slightly curved. I'd want something that looks like a wee little alto neck.

4) Old style thumbhooks just suck even if you've done the relocation and you're holding the horn out horizontally. I achieved a big improvement on my Buescher soprano when I installed a modern (Music Medic) wide thumbhook. The dreaded ring is even worse.

5) And with all that, if I play very long my thumb STILL hurts - maybe it's the 45 years of riding bicycles, drop bars on the hoods have given me a little arthritis in the thumb joint. If I were going to seriously focus on soprano, I think I'd be buying a curvie.
 
#73 · (Edited)
I've some comments:

1) I'd take all those reported weights with a block of salt given that most people don't have the foggiest idea how to make an accurate measurement. Two Buescher True Tone sopranos with 180g difference sounds bogus to me. Your bathroom scale with 240 lb range is NOT going to give you accurate weights to +/- 10g, especially if you just rest the horn on it. For things that weigh around 1.5 kgf, you need a scale with a range of something like 10 or 20 kgf, not a bathroom scale, and not a kitchen scale that goes up to 1000 g and you're overloading it and reading the dial on the second time around.

2) Most RH thumb hooks on clarinet and soprano sax are too low for someone with normal hands. Take a look at the anatomy of your hand (apparently many instrument designers never do this). When the hand's curved in a natural form, your thumb is across from your index finger, not somewhere down below the middle finger. Collapse the thumb down under there and right off the bat you're severely weakening the abiility of the thumb to hold something. Unfortunately most soprano saxophones have the alternate F# key right where the thumb needs to go. Thus, the ergonomic superiority of the Buescher/Martin layout with the up-and-down alt F# key, so there's not that tone hole back there. Unfortunately even those makes persisted in the weird under-the-middle-finger positioning of the thumbhook, but if you have a Buescher or Martin you can unsolder that thing and put it where it ought to be.

3) The whole problem is exacerbated when players hold the straight soprano down like a clarinet. 'Tain't a clarinet. It's a saxophone. Hold it OUT, nearly horizontal, so the saxophone mouthpiece interacts with you LIKE a saxophone mouthpiece. Now, the weight of the horn is being supported by your right thumb in the "gripping/clamping" direction, which is enormously strong, rather than the "pushing sideways upward" direction, whicih is the very weakest direction for the thumb to act. Holding the soprano sax like this will also improve tone and response, especially on low notes. Whenever I find I'm having low note response difficulties on soprano, I always realize I'm letting the thing sag.

The neck strap seems like a good idea, but a straight horn and a neck strap doesn't work; the neck strap will run right across the back of your left hand. Plus see my notes on embouchure. But if you put a seriously curved neck on a straight horn (I can't do this because I don't own a two piece soprano), then you'd essentially be playing a curved soprano from the low D on up, and the neck would get the thing away from your body. I have not seen many (any?) really curved necks on otherwise straight horns; it seems like they're either straight, or slightly curved. I'd want something that looks like a wee little alto neck.

4) Old style thumbhooks just suck even if you've done the relocation and you're holding the horn out horizontally. I achieved a big improvement on my Buescher soprano when I installed a modern (Music Medic) wide thumbhook. The dreaded ring is even worse.

5) And with all that, if I play very long my thumb STILL hurts - maybe it's the 45 years of riding bicycles, drop bars on the hoods have given me a little arthritis in the thumb joint. If I were going to seriously focus on soprano, I think I'd be buying a curvie.
Absolutely agree with you about the weight responses.
I knew without a doubt that my bathroom scale wasn’t close to accurate however I don’t have a food scale.

When I inquired about this type of pain, the information you’ve just given , is what I learned , which made perfect sense. The thumb rest is too low on the saxophone. Many suggestions were given and I chose the one that appealed to me the most.

Since I have been a vintage model SML alto player most of my life, ( since 1973 ) I’ve always used a neck strap so when I purchased my very first soprano, (2018), I soon discovered that playing a Bb straight model with a neck strap doesn’t quite work. The neck strap gets in the way.

Anyway I’m older and my vintage alto was getting harder to play which is why I decided to try a soprano. It looked like it would be so much lighter and easier to play so I found a used Yamaha 475 and instantly fell in love with the sound and how easy it played.

I’d read so many articles claiming that soprano is difficult to play in pitch and was pleasantly surprised that this wasn’t the case. Anyway I started playing one hour each night and was stoked.

After several weeks I could barely move my right thumb and this problem progressed. Sitting on the couch leaning back and resting the bell of the saxophone on my knee was the only comfortable position to play but not always practical.

It’s been almost 5 years since I purchased this soprano. Since then, the saxophone itself, has been damaged. 🥹( don’t wish to explain ). It still plays but doesn’t have the same sound it used to so after many soulful months of not playing , I ordered my ‘dream’ instrument which is a custom model.

My biggest mistake is second guessing myself after reading all the different opinions on here. While I discovered some very valuable information, I also encountered biased opinions which perhaps confused me. Perhaps I had opinion overload which I take full responsibility for since I’m the one reading.

Note: I do hold my soprano straight out for many reasons.

1/. The mouthpiece fits in my mouth in the proper angle
2/. It opens up my throat so much more for proper airflow
3/. I can hear myself much better so can play in key easier
4/. It takes a lot of the downwards pressure off the right thumb.

Unfortunately playing this way still hurts AND spit doesn’t quite flow out of the instrument very well.


To make a long story even longer, I ordered the Lagan Wrist Saver, a soprano saxophone with a curved neck and I have a super comfy alto neck strap that offers more length if needed. In my humble opinion, I think this combination will work to help bring back the joy I used to have of playing.

Conclusion: I’m super happy for the help I’ve received and the decisions I’ve made due to it.

So thank you once again. The visit here was well worth the time invested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.