Sax on the Web Forum banner
41 - 53 of 53 Posts
I've had my H4 for a few months and just love it. I did a "studio" recording playing sax and having the background stuff playing on a synth. I just laid the H4 on a table above the speaker, turned my back to the recorder and played. Sounds fine to me:

http://mellowood.ca/music/recordings/index.html

I recorded an entire gig I played as well. Just put the H4 above a PA speaker and recorded 3 hours in MP3. Again, sounds fine.
 
Bub99 said:
Important issues to consider and review...
Bub99, your post was nicely done (and the links to reviews are good to have, too). I wanted to weigh in and say I have an Edirol R-09 and I use it constantly, and it's great for me. For music, I use it mostly for learning tunes, hearing how something sounds, etc., not for trying to make top-quality recordings. And it's perfect for that, easy to use, light, small, etc. I also use it practically every day at work (technical writing) for recording meetings and discussions of technical topics. It's good for that, too, much better than the usual cheesy voice recorder.

I just wanted to add one thing to Bub99's list of important issues, though, mainly with regard to the "cadillac," the Sony PCM-D1. That one doesn't appear to do mp3 recording, and while that might make it look like a more serious piece of recording hardware, I wanted to say that I use mp3 a lot, even for music. The quality is just fine for the kind of thing I mentioned above (e.g., rehearsals, getting down a tune from someone, etc.), and the files are much smaller. You don't want to have to rip everything from WAV to mp3.
 
I just purchased a Sony PCM D50 and couldn't be happier. The lack of MP3 recording capability doesn't affect me in the least. I can't think of a circumstance where I would nead over 7 hours of continual recording .... and if I do, I can always buy a memory stick. It does playback MP3 if you want to load tracks for playback.

The recording quality, lack of backround noice, etc. seems great. The Menu and buttons are extremely intuitive.

The best feature .... and the one that swayed me to this particular device over the others ... is the "DPC" or "digital Pitch Control". ON Playback, you can slow down to 75% OR SPEED UP TO 100% the playback without changing the pitch. This is awesome for learning tunes, or analyzing a favorite solo. The only think now I wish it also had .... which might simply be a variation of the same technology ... would be an ability to vary the pitch without changing speed. Now THAT would give the opportunity to play in all keys!

Brian
 
I really like the H2, but haven't tried any of the others. My previous recorder was a minidisc with Sony stereo microphone (the one with a cord between microphone and plug).

My favourite things about Zoom H2:
* fits in a pocket
* easy to use
* records WAV or MP3 (selectable quality)
* nice sound with low noise (but I haven't done any "lab tests")

The 4 channel surround recording option I could do without, but stereo is great.
 
I asked this question on another H4/H2 thread but didn't get a response. I tried to record a gig a couple of weeks ago and when I was transferring the files to my computer they showed up only as empty folders marked .ZIF. Has anyone seen this before? I can't find reference to it anywhere. If anyone has any idea what these files are I'd love to know.
 
Discussion starter · #47 ·
Re: Add Microtrack vs Sony PCM D50

I started this thread last fall. I liked the specs on M-Audio Microtrack II and ordered one based on a shipping date of November or early December. The date was pushed to January, then February, and now March. Next week, I expect the date to be pushed to April or May. I'm patient (gotta be with 6 kids), but it's time to move on. After looking at the small digital recorder market, the Sony PCM D50 looks like the best recorder in the under $500 price point. It's received great reviews and has the quality I prefer with low self noise, 120 db SPL, and decent 80 db dynamic range. It doesn't have phantom power or 3 pin mic connections but the internal mics are decent enough.

When it arrives, I'll post a follow-up.
 
I have an H2 on the way. It will be used for Sax and voice recording. I was considering an external microphone for voice but admit I know nothing about it. Has anyone used an external mic. on the H2? Does the external mic. have to be powered? Thanks.
 
For my purposes the H2 works just fine; I use it as a "field" recorder for rehearsals, demos of ideas or equipment, acoustic gigs, etc. Easy to use.
Most of the problems I've read about in this thread would be solved by carefully reading the H2 manual........
 
41 - 53 of 53 Posts