OK, I'll play devil's advocate on this one. :twisted:
Myth, Urban Legend, Clever Marketing and Bollocks.
I'd be more inclined to believe the whole "Rovners kill your sound" schtick, if it weren't for the following:
1. I'm old enough to remember when Rovners were the latest fashion around here and everybody raved about the sound they got with their new Rovner lig that "fully supported the reed."
2. The whole idea of Rovner ligs deadening the sound because the contact a large surface area of the reed, rather than having small points, or strips, of contact with the reed, fails to take into account such phenomenae as string ligatures being used successfully by many players.
3. If the new styled "smaller amount of contact with the reed" type ligatures, such as the Vandoren, were the answer, why do these manufacturers keep bringinging out new models?
4. The large number of great players, yes even Jazz players, who use Rover ligs and sound great.
5. The fact that I get to hear the guy in the next practice room playing with a fantastic and bright sound, verey afternoon, despite the fact that he uses a Rovner lig which is supposed to deaden and darken the sound.
I could go on, but I'm not trying to build an unassailable argument here. I'm just trying to make the point that we've all been sold a bridge by the ligature manufacturers.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed a remarkable similarity between ligatures and disposable razors.
1. Both are over-priced for what they are and the purpose they serve.
2. Both are constantly marketed with new improvements over last month's model, which was marketed as the optimum, as was the preceeding month's model.
3. Both are marketed as being the cutting edge in design, materials and engineering, when in fact, if such claims were even close to true, the manufacturers would have to charge even more than the ridiculously high prices they already charge, to cover the costs of such expensive design, materials, manufacturing, and marketing.
4. Both tend to focus on gimmicky add ons designed to give the impression of added value to the consumer, when in reality, if the aforementioned claims of cutting edge design (excuse the pun) and manufacture were true, such gimmicks (or pressure plates) would be unecessary.
The parallels are obvious and the marketing strategy is common practice when selling a product that is essentially no different to your competitors in terms of function and performance. You need a gimmick to differentiate your product from all the others that are just like it. Either that, or you need to price your product as a premium item to give customers the impression that your product is better than the competition, even though that product might be just a few twists of wire with a few bits of metal. Did someone say Francois Louis???
In fact, a better analogy might have been the similarities between ligatures and cosmetics.
It's all a fashion thing.