Sax on the Web Forum banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
14,671 Posts
Probably best left to sound engineers and other techies who can define it. But as a layman, I know it (good vs. bad) acoustics when I hear it. For me it is the presence or absence of natural reverb in a room. My kitchen/family room has a lot of reverb, but my home-office is very dull with the door closed. It probably is good to practice in a dull room so when you actually come across a live room, you will appreciate the assist it seems to give.

I also use the word "acoustic" to define the way I like to play - pure instrument sound without any amplification. Same with guitars and other less powerful instruments - I much prefer an acoustic guitar or piano as opposed to one being amplified. Electric pianos may be necessary at some venues, but I'll take an unamplified regular piano anytime. DAVE
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
26,680 Posts
Acoustics is the physics of sound. The best way to start to understand acoustics would be to learn basic physics, and apply that knowledge to sound.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,644 Posts

· Out of Office
Grafton + TH & C alto || Naked Lady 10M || TT soprano || Martin Comm III
Joined
·
30,061 Posts
Good or bad room acoustics can be subjective. It is the ambience or "sound" that the room adds to the sound that comes out of your saxophone. The room sound can vary from a full on long reverberation that you would get in a large church, to a very short "ambience" that you get in your living room.

Sometimes it can be more of an echo, e.g. in a concert hall when much of the sound you hear is what bounces straight back off the wall behind the audience.

Furniture, curtains, people or acoustic treatment can lessen the ambience which you get more of when there are more smooth or shiny surfaces.

So good room acoustics are those that sound nice for the purpose. A reverberant church may sound good for a choir, but not for a rock band, as reverberation often sounds when there is a lot of bass. This is why in pop and rock recordings, it's often best to record in a studio that is quite dry (ie little room sound) and then add some room sound, the reverberation or echo in the mix where there s full control of how much and on what instruments.

If you record in a room that has significant ambience it can be a good thing if the room sounds good, but it is difficult or impossible to remove that sound from the recording, ie you are stuck with it. If a room is too reverberant for what you want, it can be deadened by hanging drapes, duvets or specially manufactured acoustic baffles.

More info here:

http://mediamusicforum.com/home-studio-acoustics.html
 

· Distinguished Technician & SOTW Columnist. RIP, Yo
Joined
·
17,082 Posts
Good post, Tony.

It probably is good to practice in a dull room so when you actually come across a live room, you will appreciate the assist it seems to give.
I agree. A lively room hides a multitude of articulation blemishes between notes, and also slovenly tone production, so does nothing to encourage the player to correct these.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top