Sax on the Web Forum banner
1 - 20 of 32 Posts

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
What's up SOTW!

For the past few months, I have tried a few different Otto Link bari mouthpieces on my 12m, and I have come up with some observations that I think could help others on a bari mouthpiece quest - much like SOTW has helped me on mine.

A little background - when I switched to bari as my main horn in 2008 (1934 Conn 12M 260xxx) I bought an Erik G Vandoren double chamber V5 mouthpiece with the horn, then an even better Erik G Vandoren special, and I only used extra large chambered mouthpieces until last summer. So, I was a little curious as to whether the Links (still large chambered but not HUGE like my other mouthpieces) would tune as well on my horn that had mouthpieces made specifically for it. But, I also knew that I really wanted to experiment with a few Links, having seen so many people report success with them (call it GAS exacerbated by quarantine...)

The first one I bought last summer was a new STM 7* from WWBW. The moment I tried it, I immediately liked everything about it. So rich and beefy, and yet so easy to blow. I play it mostly with Vandoren Blue Box 2.5 and La Voz MH and both reeds are a good match, but the Blue Box are my favorites with this mouthpiece. Also, it passes the pop/suction test better than any other mouthpiece I've tried. So I think it came out of the factory with a nice facing. It was a tad sharp for me at first, but over time, I have learned to relax my embouchure a bit and it plays in tune just fine now. It may have had something to do also with the fact that I was so used to playing rubber mouthpieces for so long that the metal mouthpiece was much slimmer and I needed to get used to it without biting. Now, I really like this mouthpiece and feel like I hit the Link jackpot.

Oh - another thing re: ligatures - as many have noted in other threads, the stock Link ligs can be just terrible. I think it's good that this is so well-known because then you don't have to count on their ligature working -- just account for the fact that you'll need another lig from the get-go. For me with this lig/mouthpiece combination, the reed will come loose unless I'm really careful when adjusting for tuning, etc. I bought a Rovner 3MVL (the one specifically made for bari metal Links) with the mouthpiece, and it works like a charm. I know some folks hate Rovners but I'm not one of them - with this metal Link in particular, it just works.

I then bought an STM 8* to try a bigger opening. When I got the 8*, I saw what people mean when they say that Links can be a little inconsistent out of the box. The 8* has noticeably more rollover baffle - about twice as much - and much thinner side rails than the 7*. Most importantly to me, it was 1/4" shorter. So while the 7* tunes okay for me as-is, this piece did play sharper in a way that was harder to control. I don't know that it's impossible - maybe with time and practice I'd get the pitch right. But what I did instead was send it to Mojobari to have the shank extended and have him analyze the piece and let me know what he thought could be perfected. Mojo, being a man of impeccable integrity, told me that he thought the facing was fine - it had a couple of minor imperfections but that it was okay and didn't need work, other than the tuning part. So, I had him just do the shank extension, and he did such an amazing job. Check out the attached pic. It now plays in tune really well. I still like the way the 7* plays better all-around regarding tone and response, but if something happened to the 7*, I've got a good backup now -- it's a "no excuses" mouthpiece.

If you check out the pic, you'll notice that the 7* has some discoloration in the mouthpiece -- unpictured areas of the mouthpiece have that corrosion as well. That happened almost immediately, and I'm not sure why, but I don't care. It's just cosmetic. But if that's something that would bother you, be warned that it's a possibility. Oh, and the stock lig doesn't work with the 8* at ALL. The body of the mouthpiece is ever so slightly slimmer than the 7* and that makes the lig way too loose. My Rovner again came to the rescue.

Lastly, I bought a rubber Tone Edge 8 to see how it compares to the metal pieces. My Tone Edge plays really nicely with a slightly less edgy, slightly more "woody" tone than the STM 7* - SLIGHTLY. Same blue box 2.5 and La Voz MH reeds - I slightly prefer the latter on this piece. I feel like the STM has a little more power and edge in reserve, which is why I like it more, but the Tone Edge is another no excuses mouthpiece. The key word that I keep using is slightly -- ultimately, they both help me sound like me. Whether you prefer rubber or metal is also going to make a huge difference, of course. The Tone Edge takes a pretty open embouchure because the beak is pretty thick. The ligature that came with this mouthpiece is trash - literally, I threw it in the trash immediately, because it was so small that I couldn't get a reed to even fit in it. A Rovner hard rubber TENOR ligature, in my case the Rovner light L-8, does the trick.

So, in conclusion, though they have their inconsistencies, all three Links play well out of the box. One plays exceptionally well, for me. The STM 7* is the only one that I had been playing outside of the house (back when that was a thing), in big band and small group - it has earned my trust. Without the shank extension, I don't know that I could get along with the 8* tuning on my horn, but Mojo fixed that beautifully, and this is definitely a plug for his services if that's something that could help you, depending on your horn and how you blow and all that. The Tone Edge is a really good mouthpiece too, and if you know you prefer hard rubber mouthpieces, or you are on a budget and don't really know where to start with bari mouthpieces, it is almost $100 less, so a Tone Edge would be a great place to start, on a vintage horn or on any horn. You might find that you want to upgrade later, or you might find that any of these are the mouthpiece for you right off the bat. Just make sure you have a Rovner or some other lig that you know will work with whatever Link you decide to go with. Bari Links are great mouthpieces. Bari Links for the win!

Thanks for reading my long, quarantined thoughts -- it helps to get them out. My wife likes the finished product when it comes to music, but sometimes we need to share the process with folks, too. :) I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
Miguel AKA Rahspeak
 

Attachments

· Forum Contributor 2015-17
Joined
·
2,356 Posts
Nice report. I have a TE 7 from the 90s that is good enough that I don't really need another mouthpiece. On my Conn of similar vintage, it's pretty far out on the cork though. I would have to work with it for a while. And I have a recent STM 8 that I sent to mojo, with the same result. Out of the box there were visible imperfections on the facing, but it played well. Nevertheless, i asked him to clean up the facing and add a small epoxy baffle. That one plays great on my Conn. Not as well as my Morgan Florida, though. And my favorite is still a refaced (by mojo) rubber Berg. Of course the V16 is great too, as is the Yanagisawa metal, and the new AM, and the EG double chamber yani, not to mention the extended RPC high baffle, JJ Jet and LeBayle Rosie. I need to sell mouthpieces.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Nice report. I have a TE 7 from the 90s that is good enough that I don't really need another mouthpiece. On my Conn of similar vintage, it's pretty far out on the cork though. I would have to work with it for a while. And I have a recent STM 8 that I sent to mojo, with the same result. Out of the box there were visible imperfections on the facing, but it played well. Nevertheless, i asked him to clean up the facing and add a small epoxy baffle. That one plays great on my Conn. Not as well as my Morgan Florida, though. And my favorite is still a refaced (by mojo) rubber Berg. Of course the V16 is great too, as is the Yanagisawa metal, and the new AM, and the EG double chamber yani, not to mention the extended RPC high baffle, JJ Jet and LeBayle Rosie. I need to sell mouthpieces.
I think for me, the TE has such a big bite that it helps me open my throat and adjust to keep it in tune. But as always, YMMV.

How is the V16's pitch for you on the Conn? And the AM? I thought about those too, but I was less confident in my ability to play them in tune on the 12m for some reason...

Please don't sell any of those mouthpieces to me. I spent several years with the same setup, which is a good way to learn how to play a horn and mouthpiece. Now I that I have opened myself up to experimentation, you see some of the results above. And, I just bought a Woodwind Co. that I'm going to have opened up a bit while trying to stick to the same basic ethos of the mouthpiece. (I've also been listening to pretty much nothing but Harry Carney--I'm not asking the mouthpiece to do all the work for me!) I don't need to try anything else for now (I keep telling myself). That Morgan is real intriguing, though...
 

· Forum Contributor 2015-17
Joined
·
2,356 Posts
I think for me, the TE has such a big bite that it helps me open my throat and adjust to keep it in tune. But as always, YMMV.

How is the V16's pitch for you on the Conn? And the AM? I thought about those too, but I was less confident in my ability to play them in tune on the 12m for some reason...

Please don't sell any of those mouthpieces to me. I spent several years with the same setup, which is a good way to learn how to play a horn and mouthpiece. Now I that I have opened myself up to experimentation, you see some of the results above. And, I just bought a Woodwind Co. that I'm going to have opened up a bit while trying to stick to the same basic ethos of the mouthpiece. (I've also been listening to pretty much nothing but Harry Carney--I'm not asking the mouthpiece to do all the work for me!) I don't need to try anything else for now (I keep telling myself). That Morgan is real intriguing, though...
I bought an extension for the V16 to use it on the Conn. Haven't tried the AM on it but I would be very surprised. Although I think not all of these older Conns are the same. Just fyi, the current Meyer and rubber Berg Larsen have extra long shanks.

I think you're right, that the TE forces you to use the throat more. I used mine for a few big band sets a couple of years ago, and my throat was kind of sore the next day.

I applaud your determination to stick with a setup.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
8,939 Posts
I’m sure you could have Erik from the mouthpiece guys do a double chamber on that V16.
I know someone who did his own chamber enlargement on a B95 and got it to tune well on a troublesome The Martin Baritone.
I’ve also done some work on a Yanagisawa Hard Rubber piece which involved enlargement of the chamber and scooping out the side rails.
Coupled with a new facing it’s become a great piece along the lines of a Slant Link.
And tunes very well on my Conn transitional and the Martin Baritones.
Plays a little flat on modern horns though.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
I applaud your determination to stick with a setup.
Yeah, but I have broken the GAS seal, and look at me now! Today, I just barely missed out on an auction for a Conn Eagle! Making up for lost time, I suppose, or just experimenting because it's fun.

A Meyer is also on my (now much shorter) list of mouthpieces that I want to try. I think it's a similar idea to the Links and the Woodwind Co. and even the Conn Eagle -- the horn is historic and has gotten great sounds throughout history with all of these different traditional combinations, and I got curious about trying them out for myself.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
I'm sure you could have Erik from the mouthpiece guys do a double chamber on that V16.
I know someone who did his own chamber enlargement on a B95 and got it to tune well on a troublesome The Martin Baritone.
I've also done some work on a Yanagisawa Hard Rubber piece which involved enlargement of the chamber and scooping out the side rails.
Coupled with a new facing it's become a great piece along the lines of a Slant Link.
And tunes very well on my Conn transitional and the Martin Baritones.
Plays a little flat on modern horns though.
My main mouthpiece that I played for the longest time was an Erik G B95 that he did his double chamber mod to and also added a wedge baffle, much more than the usual baffle he would finish those pieces with. It's a beautiful thing. I'm not ready to take the leap yet into trying it on my own, though it does sound like fun.

You're absolutely right about the too-flat thing, also -- I concur. There's a lot of info out there about vintage horns needing large-enough chambers to play well in tune, but I haven't seen the opposite mentioned as much -- mouthpieces with really large chambers that are a perfect match with vintage horns struggle with modern horns. I tried to make my EG B75 work on a Yamaha 62 bari and really struggled, even with some time to work with it -- it was pushed in past the cork. Same thing with a Caravan. That's another thing I like about my preferred STM -- it works well enough with both vintage and modern horns.
 

· Forum Contributor 2015-17
Joined
·
2,356 Posts
Definitely true. I have an EG double chamber Yani that is great on my Conn and unusable on my low A yanagisawa. The only mouthpieces I have that easily play on both are a rubber Berg and a modern Meyer. The Berg is just plain great.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
422 Posts
Adding my experiences with two relatively new modern STM bari pieces. First was a 7* I tried briefly in a shop, it played very good. Not sure if it was a hand picked demo piece or a random box.

Second one is my main piece, a non-star 7 which I got in a trade against a Ponzol M1. Not a hand picked piece, just a one-off from an online shop. The objective observations: it is very symmetrical and nice looking overall. But it does have easily visible corrosion looking dark splotches along most of the length in the outer surface, which I assume is some kind of a seam or mold line. Doesn't bother me but I could see how someone would be unhappy to have that in a well kept piece just some years old!

It also passes the suction pop test with flyyying colors. It's pretty funny/satisfying to listen, completely sealed for a second or so, then looong hiss and pop. I have not seen any other piece perform even close to that, SATB included.

I don't have the original lig, but it works well with a rovner-style leather BG ligature

I'm relatively newly moved on to bari, and also my current King bari is quite a recent acquisition, so take everything with a grain of salt. And I can't say what can be attributed to the sax, what to the very good playing condition and adjustment it's in, and what to the mouthpiece. With that said onto some more subjective observations:

I will say, as a whole, it's by far the best playing setup I have ever had the privilege of play or even briefly try out, SATB included. Folks here say vintage american type saxes get along well with large-ish chamber pieces like a link, and I'm inclined to believe there is truth to that. Checked with a tuner and intonation was very good, much more slotted in what I'm come to expect from myself.

I'm still learning to shape the tone with this setup, especially as it is very free blowing which I'm not that used to. But it gives me immediate feedback from a little overtone practice, and is in general very responsive to all changes in voicing and throat stuff. I do have trouble producing a smoky airy subtone kind of tone though, the thing wants to sing with resonance - that ability may come with practice or not. Otherwise it's quite easy to play ppp, and I like how one can play loud with an roaring quality OR with almost bass clarinet type of clear woody tone.

Palm keys are funny. Usually they are quite easy to play, but the challenge is to play them with a nice tone, and with practice you can gradually improve that. With this setup though they are very binary, they either sound like TOTAL CRAP / NO SOUND AT ALL or with an amazingly full and nice tone. So I need to practice overtones and absolutely nail voicing or whatever I have to subconsciously do to make them play at all, but when they do play it's very, very good.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
118 Posts
I'm currently using a Caravan piece on my old Buescher Truetone/aristocrat frankenhorn and it plays mostly in tune but puched most of the way on. I'm thinking about getting a Tone Edge 6. I don't think the chamber will be as large. Can anyone give me an idea if there would be issues moving to this piece on an old american horn? (approx 1911 by the serial number).
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
The chamber of the Tone Edge will definitely not be as large and would tune further out on the neck cork. I have a Caravan also and I do not put it as far on my neck as yours -- it goes somewhere in the halfway neighborhood for me. So I suspect there will be enough neck cork for you to use the Tone Edge with good results and not have to have it pulled all the way out on the cork. You might also dig the added power and brightness you can get from the Tone Edge (while still being capable of great warmth and beauty). It's worth a shot!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
118 Posts
Thanks for your reply, I'm also now considering On of Pete Thomas' PPT mouthpieces that are based on the slant sig pieces.
I'll report back once I decide and have had a chance to play.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
8,939 Posts
Thanks for your reply, I'm also now considering On of Pete Thomas' PPT mouthpieces that are based on the slant sig pieces.
I'll report back once I decide and have had a chance to play.
These have a good sized chamber and tune well on my old Conn and The Martin Baritones.
Although I actually have the Power model, I'm told that the Signature model is much the same but less baffle.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,642 Posts
Out of my large collection of Bari mouthpieces, I find the PPT Signature works the best on my 12m, a bit punchier than my V5 double chamber, more dynamic range than my Grande Supreme, rounder and fuller than my several Bergs and freer plowing than my Lawton. Of course on my Selmer these choices are all different!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
118 Posts
I bit the bullet today and ordered the PPT Signature mouthpiece. I'll be watching for the postie.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
734 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
I bit the bullet today and ordered the PPT Signature mouthpiece. I'll be watching for the postie.
Nice. I bit the bullet too, and I wanted to quickly update and add that since I wrote this post, I picked up a Meyer 8 at a nice discount on eBay. It really plays nicely with a rich tone similar to the Tone Edge, but even better in-tune -- needs less attention to keep the pitch down on my 12m. I think I think I like it better than the Tone Edge, but still not as much as my favorite STM.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
675 Posts
Very useful post for me, since I am mainly a baritone player.
I play a Conn12M and a vintage Otto Link slant tone edge mouthpiece.
The mouthpiece has a 1cm extention on the shank and it is refaced to '115 (originaly it was a 5*)
I don't know who did the job, I bought it in these conditions five years ago.
I achieved the best results using Vandoren blue box 3 reeds and Francois Louis XL pure brass ligature.
I don't know if there are better mouthpieces,reeds or ligatures out there, but for me this set up works, so I haven't change anything for five years.
All the other mouthpieces that I have tried sounded less rich and too bright.
I go for a dark, woody cavernous tone, I don't want a bright sound.
My problem is only that I don't have any mouthpiece to replace my Link, I only have one baritone mouthpiece.
So maybe I could buy a modern tone edge just to have a backup.
Does anybody have compared an actual tone edge to a vintage one? (I don't like metal mouthpieces, I only play hard rubber).
If you want to listen to my set up this is a link
 

· Registered
Joined
·
92 Posts
I picked up a VI to low Bb from a forum member recently so I thought I’d revisit mouthpieces to settle in with for the long haul. I ordered a new STM 7* from ProWinds and their interpretation of “In Stock” is to have it drop shipped by Babbitt. When it arrived I had to laugh ... one rail was grossly thicker than the other, the tip did not resemble the shape of a reed, the center seam showed so much in the baffle that I could imagine the mouthpiece splitting, and it played like a dog. On a piece shipped directly from Babbitt. I can’t imagine why they would ever have boxed or shipped it.

So back it went and back to my V16 B7 I went for now. I’m a huge fan of Meyers on alto so maybe I’ll order one for bari. Actually, I just remembered that I have a mint, unplayed in-the-box Meyer NY USA 5M (Version 2) for bari buried in my mouthpiece drawer that I picked up years ago. I’ll experiment tonight. Is it true that an older Meyer 5M would play or measure more like a modern 7M?

I also have a DVNY 8 I picked up from a forum member years ago that plays very easy but the sound seems nondescript.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top