Joined
·
14,671 Posts
I realize mouthpiece response, tone and choices are VERY subjective, but I thought you may enjoy reading this.
I got my old MKVI alto back from my son earlier this week and found a Meyer 6M-Medium Chamber mouthpiece in the case. I knew it had been there and was glad it remained.
That made me get out my two Meyer mouthpieces and do a comparison. I used a Vandoren ZZ #2 reed I'd adjusted and a Selmer metal two-screw lig on the MKVI.
The three pieces were a Meyer 6M-Medium Chamber (from the horn's case), my Meyer 6S-Medium Chamber, and my Meyer 7M-Small Chamber. They all looked similar to my eye. If they hadn't been marked one could easily have assumed they were the same facing, tip-opening and chamber-size.
I played them all and they ended up being just as I remembered them. The 6S-Medium Chamber was superior - good response, big sound, lots of resonance.
The 7M-Small Chamber felt as strong or stronger than the 6S-M but the response was a bit more difficult - not as solid and sure as the 6S-M, the resonance not quite as good as the 6S-M and the focus was more narrow.
The 6M-M was the least desirable - the tone was muffled, the resonance was less, but it was focused. It was clearly not up to the 6S or the 7M. Had I never experienced the 6S, the 6M may have been acceptable and I'm sure an audience probably would not hear the differences I felt. Still, a good mouthpiece can make all the difference to the player and that is important.
Regardless of whether or not I could see differences among them, I sure felt and heard them. And, I suppose that if I went into a big reed-search I could maybe enhance the results, but the 6S-M works so well, I don't feel the need to go further than this. DAVE
I got my old MKVI alto back from my son earlier this week and found a Meyer 6M-Medium Chamber mouthpiece in the case. I knew it had been there and was glad it remained.
That made me get out my two Meyer mouthpieces and do a comparison. I used a Vandoren ZZ #2 reed I'd adjusted and a Selmer metal two-screw lig on the MKVI.
The three pieces were a Meyer 6M-Medium Chamber (from the horn's case), my Meyer 6S-Medium Chamber, and my Meyer 7M-Small Chamber. They all looked similar to my eye. If they hadn't been marked one could easily have assumed they were the same facing, tip-opening and chamber-size.
I played them all and they ended up being just as I remembered them. The 6S-Medium Chamber was superior - good response, big sound, lots of resonance.
The 7M-Small Chamber felt as strong or stronger than the 6S-M but the response was a bit more difficult - not as solid and sure as the 6S-M, the resonance not quite as good as the 6S-M and the focus was more narrow.
The 6M-M was the least desirable - the tone was muffled, the resonance was less, but it was focused. It was clearly not up to the 6S or the 7M. Had I never experienced the 6S, the 6M may have been acceptable and I'm sure an audience probably would not hear the differences I felt. Still, a good mouthpiece can make all the difference to the player and that is important.
Regardless of whether or not I could see differences among them, I sure felt and heard them. And, I suppose that if I went into a big reed-search I could maybe enhance the results, but the 6S-M works so well, I don't feel the need to go further than this. DAVE