Sax on the Web Forum banner

Rock Bari - low A or Bb

1756 Views 6 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  BariMelt
I don't know if this was asked before or not.

Which would be the bari for rock and roll - low A or Bb? I've heard about the projection w/Low A but wouldn't a mic pump it out?

I'm looking at a Keilwerth low A. Note: every bari I've played has been a low Bb.

Thanks
1 - 1 of 7 Posts
You can use a low Bb bari for rock. One of the most popular session players in LA, David Woodford, uses his low Bb Selmer Mk VI with a low A extension that Paul Coats devised. Here's a link to how to make it: http://www.bassic-sax.ca/low_a.html

Having said that, I have both a low Bb and a low A bari. I like both of them, but for different reasons. I tend to use my low Bb for jazz and my low A for rock/blues...But that has more to do with what each sounds like than anything else. I've got a Selmer VI low Bb, and a Medusa low A. The Medusa has a much edgier tone and lends itself better to the blues band that I play in. However, before I got the Medusa, I always used the Selmer, and that held it's own in a rock/blues environment.

Play the Keilworth. See if you like it. Compare it to the horns you've played in the past. The best comparison would be of course be to compare a low Bb and a low A side by side and pick the one you like better.

Either way, don't let the perceived need for a low A determine the horn you get. Pick the one that you like the sound of better. (Assuming that the horns are close in action, set up, quality, etc. etc.)
See less See more
1 - 1 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top