TJ: I think it is another myth. We can parse all this technical stuff to death, but it boils down to the individual horns and the players.
I mean . . . how do it know?!?!
It would take hundreds of side-by-sides to objectively conclude that posts vs. ribs made a difference and/or to isolate those factors from other factors that make a nice playing/responding saxophone.
This to me is like the finishes' debate or the resonators' debate, etc. I have saxophones of both designs (and have played many more of both designs) and there are those that play well and those that don't. How can anyone say it is because of the ribbing or the posts?
But if someone wants to believe it, so be it. DAVE
I mean . . . how do it know?!?!
It would take hundreds of side-by-sides to objectively conclude that posts vs. ribs made a difference and/or to isolate those factors from other factors that make a nice playing/responding saxophone.
This to me is like the finishes' debate or the resonators' debate, etc. I have saxophones of both designs (and have played many more of both designs) and there are those that play well and those that don't. How can anyone say it is because of the ribbing or the posts?
But if someone wants to believe it, so be it. DAVE