I did and I thought so, he is asking where and how to find a Mark VI the cheapest possible way, regardless, answering with unrequested suggestions is a phenomenon happening with increasing frequency and it baffles me.
I did and I thought so, he is asking where and how to find a Mark VI the cheapest possible way, regardless, answering with unrequested suggestions is a phenomenon happening with increasing frequency and it baffles me.I understand your point, but did you read the entire OP? Do you really think, based on the information provided, that he really wants/needs a Mark VI and that should be the only option discussed in the thread?
Now, that's funny. And I'm a Yanagisawa fan.My yani 992 t is so amazing my friend wanted to trade me his Mark V1 I kid you not
This just isn't true. A good tech can put a MKVI into perfect playing condition (assuming it hasn't been run over by a truck), and the VI is a very robust horn that will stay in good shape once it's been overhauled. It costs just as much to re-pad or do equivalent work on any other horn. In fact, I'd bet some techs would prefer working on a VI or other well-made horn, than a cheap, poorly built horn. Seems like the better-built horn should be less work to get into proper adjustment, etc. If you take even moderately good care of the horn, the only parts needing replacement are readily available (pads, corks, springs, etc).you're still dealing with a very old instrument that is going to drain your wallet at every turn; ....shops jack up the price for everything associated with maintaining/repairing one, replacement clamp collars (neck receiver) and other parts are not available..
This s how I got a player's MK VI. From my tech who took it from unplayable to 110% and charged me under $4k for it. It's possible, I know because I just did it.This just isn't true. A good tech can put a MKVI into perfect playing condition (assuming it hasn't been run over by a truck), and the VI is a very robust horn that will stay in good shape once it's been overhauled. It costs just as much to re-pad or do equivalent work on any other horn. In fact, I'd bet some techs would prefer working on a VI or other well-made horn, than a cheap, poorly built horn. Seems like the better-built horn should be less work to get into proper adjustment, etc. If you take even moderately good care of the horn, the only parts needing replacement are readily available (pads, corks, springs, etc).
I'm not saying the OP absolutely should get a VI, but if that's what he wants and if he has relatives who can afford to buy him one, I'd say go for it. Man, that horn brasscane has for sale would be 'case closed' if I was the OP. The thread title says $5-6k. So you there you have it.
Go back to Dr G's post, #26 for the link (I tried to copy it here, but it didn't work).
Disclaimer: I don't know brasscane and he's not giving me a commission or anything like that. But man, what a beautiful horn at a reasonable price (for a VI in such good condition)!
There's a grain of truth here, especially the 'closet horn' comment. I often wonder why some old horns obviously weren't played much. But then it could just be the owner(s) thought they wanted to play, then got discouraged and put the horn away.2. I have a friend that plays tenor professionally. He plays a MkVI. When he was looking for a tenor, he tried no fewer than eight MkVIs, and disliked the first seven. He loved number eight, but he disliked seven. Some would call it a good thing for the player, but Selmers are not known for their consistency.
3. Closet horns might have wound up as such for a reason.
Moral of the story - try it before you buy it. Just because every moderately wealthy tenor sax player and his grandmother plays a MkVI, doesn't mean they're the best sax for you.
Buy high, sell higher. That's how we do it.I have a 98xxx (relac w/ recent overhaul) that will be for sale again in the near future. 6000 asking price...
Well considering I've played on it as my main horn for over a year, and I originally got it by trading straight up for my replated SBA I'd hardly call it "buy high, sell higher". The lacquer is in amazing condition, and the horn has had very little in the way of repairs, so I think 6000 is a fair asking price for 5 digit 1962/63 (I forget which year) era mark VI.Buy high, sell higher. That's how we do it.
Thanks. That's the good thing about a market. It regulates itself generally. I feel like the Mark VI prices have been going down a bit, but I have a feeling prices will start going up again as the economy recovers...You're right. That is a good price. Generally we see horns here over-priced and then slowly backed down. I'm guilty of it also. It's a buyers market now.
This is profound. I wouldn't hand over my horn to a talking head without cash.From my experience with buying anything high-dollar, cash talks, bull****e walks.
Whenever I hear this, I wonder what is so bad about the others that it cannot be remedied. I find it hard to believe. Obviously a larger fraction of the five digit horns have something special and the design changed, but still...I have a friend that plays tenor professionally. He plays a MkVI. When he was looking for a tenor, he tried no fewer than eight MkVIs, and disliked the first seven. He loved number eight, but he disliked seven. Some would call it a good thing for the player, but Selmers are not known for their consistency.
That is Milton Freeman for saxes. Politics aren't allowed here.Thanks. That's the good thing about a market. It regulates itself generally. I feel like the Mark VI prices have been going down a bit, but I have a feeling prices will start going up again as the economy recovers...
Thank you. That was my thought too. Buy my sax and we can all move on to other threads.Man, that horn brasscane has for sale would be 'case closed' if I was the OP. The thread title says $5-6k. So you there you have it!
My mom would feel sorry for you. My so called friends would have you count your blessings.Disclaimer: I don't know brasscane...