Sax on the Web Forum banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I keep seeing some older horns shown as Martin-Yanagisawa stencil. From what I do know the horn would have been made by Yani but for Martin. But what I don't know is what did they do different? Or did they do anything different other than having another name on it?
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member and Forum Contributor 20
Joined
·
1,421 Posts
The saxes really weren't made for "Martin", as Martin had already gone out of business by that time. However, Leblanc owned the Martin name and the saxes were made for Leblanc and Leblanc put the Martin name on them. No changes (other than the engraving) were done to the saxes - they are the same as the corresponding Yani sax model - usually an 800 or an 880.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Fred said:
The saxes really weren't made for "Martin", as Martin had already gone out of business by that time. However, Leblanc owned the Martin name and the saxes were made for Leblanc and Leblanc put the Martin name on them. No changes (other than the engraving) were done to the saxes - they are the same as the corresponding Yani sax model - usually an 800 or an 880.
Okay, so it the same horn build and quality wise, but why did they produce the same sax that they were already selling with the name of a company that was out of business? Were they selling them at a different price? And how does that effect resale value today?
 

· Registered
MKVI Alto Yani s6/800 sc800 A880 A990B A992 , , Vito duke T991 T5 T901 ul B901
Joined
·
666 Posts
i wastold they produced these horns under different names to help get around the import duty ie how many they were allowed to import into different countries
now days the import laws have changed allowing more into the country
 

· Mouthpiece Refacer Extraordinaire and Forum Contri
Joined
·
3,584 Posts
Martin/Yanis, like most older Yanis, are great players. Their lesser market value is only a matter of their lesser recognition and demand. Fear not.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member and Forum Contributor 20
Joined
·
1,421 Posts
There was also the issue of Leblanc wanting to be able to provide a pro level sax to their dealers and their customers without having to manufacture one themselves.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
4,518 Posts
I had heard (similar to the above) that by branding it with an 'American" brand, Leblanc did not have to pay any duties, as this was an American product manufactured overseas (before that became commonplace and they closed the loopholes in the laws).
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
1,672 Posts
I believe the reason was that the Martin name was much better known at that time. With the exception of "Selmer", the American brand names were the most respected in the broader American market. As we know, much like the Detroit automakers, they pissed the decades of "goodwill" away.

As I recall, the (Yani)Martins were very highly regarded "back in the day".:cool:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Hey all- Not sure if anyone is still following this thread (as it's been YEARS) but I'm trying to date what I think is a Yani/Martin stencil low A bari sax. Serial number is 07781473, so my best guess from a bit of quick research is it was made in 1978. Can anyone help identify if this is correct?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
477 Posts
Hey all- Not sure if anyone is still following this thread (as it's been YEARS) but I'm trying to date what I think is a Yani/Martin stencil low A bari sax. Serial number is 07781473, so my best guess from a bit of quick research is it was made in 1978. Can anyone help identify if this is correct?
That serial number pattern matches to the style of a Yanagisawa manufactured in July 1978.
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top