Sax on the Web Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,587 Posts
Based on only that one photo I would lean towards 'relacquer' but more photos, higher resolution photos, and multiple views of the engraving would help.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,024 Posts
Yes, but I’d like to see the front of the bell. It looks like they took it easy on the buffing around the stamp and went at it on the front.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,024 Posts
Really hard to tell. It seems the owner would know. If they aren’t sure, I’d consider it relacquered for not knowing or not being forthcoming if they’re trying to hide it.
If it’s re-lacquered, at least it was done well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,042 Posts
Whaler's right: "If it's relacquered, at least it's well done."

You can often tell a relacquer job by looking at the outer edges of the bell design, e.g., to the left of the Selmer logo and below, down to where the bell engraving ends just above the Bb cup. If any of the engraved lines there look at all blurred, it's most probably a relacq.

Of course, if you just want a horn to play, rather than as a collector's investment, relacquer is GOOD.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top