There’s this thing called inflation.......Considering that horn sold for around $250 maybe $300 when it was new, paying 15K for it would just be stupid. This is the clip people thinking of buying a Mark VI should watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puApTzibuHM
There's also this thing called "overvaluation".There’s this thing called inflation.......
This horn is obviously greatly overvalued as a tool (i.e., it's not materially better than other horns costing far less), but whether it's overvalued as an asset is determined by the market.There's also this thing called "overvaluation".
As others have pointed out, you can't compare the $300 in, say 1960, with $15k today. $300 back then is about $2500 today, taking inflation into account (https://www.dollartimes.com/inflation/inflation.php?amount=300&year=1960).Considering that horn sold for around $250 maybe $300 when it was new, paying 15K for it would just be stupid. This is the clip people thinking of buying a Mark VI should watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puApTzibuHM
Why is it they have guys with a so-so sound telling us what is a good sax?Considering that horn sold for around $250 maybe $300 when it was new, paying 15K for it would just be stupid. This is the clip people thinking of buying a Mark VI should watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puApTzibuHM
Sure there is, and I don’t buy the overvalued ones!There's also this thing called "overvaluation".
Agree with postWhy is it they have guys with a so-so sound telling us what is a good sax?
Please get somebody with a good sound to demonstrate your horns.
So what you're saying is that only the greatest players are capable of getting a great sound out of a Mark VI? Or, could it be that a great player can make any horn sound good.Why is it they have guys with a so-so sound telling us what is a good sax?
Please get somebody with a good sound to demonstrate your horns.