Sax on the Web Forum banner
21 - 40 of 65 Posts

· Forum Contributor 2017
“I play sax but mostly it plays me”
Joined
·
10,478 Posts
Discussion Starter · #21 ·
I don’t know about the story about Ernie Watts is interesting. I’m not sure about Phil Barone making him a mouthpiece or not. I have never heard Ernie say that. I did here him talk about his .160 and .165 tip opening pieces he had made. He talked about them in one of his masterclasses. I think you can find the video on YouTube. It should be the hour long one from PMWoodwind. I do know that he does have a significant baffle in it though. He talks about that too.
Thanks for sharing a must watch
 

· Forum Contributor 2017
“I play sax but mostly it plays me”
Joined
·
10,478 Posts
Discussion Starter · #24 ·
A few years ago there was a Berg in an original 220 facing for sale on ebay...
Last time I saw Jon Irabagon he was playing a Link STM original 13* with total control and mastery...
Must have a powerful sound
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
26,680 Posts
I got into large tips for awhile. I have an RPC rollover that's marked .135 and a high baffle RPC that's marked .145. They have long lays, so are surprisingly easy to play. I stopped playing big tips because I found that I would get my lower lip pinched where the reed meets the mouthpiece. I have a 10mfan robusto 9 in both hr and gold plated brass. Great mouthpieces, but I love how my 8* Marantz slant legacy plays for 1st tenor in a big band.

I tried a Fred Rast .096 scroll shank selmer. Great sound, but exhausting to play. Phil Englemann refaced a Meyer for me at .092. It's a fantastic mouthpiece--the sound is dark but still complex. It works great with combos, but doesn't cut through enough playing lead alto with a big band, so I got a Marantz Meyer at .072.

I prefer smaller tips on soprano and bari.
 

· Distinguished Member
Joined
·
2,129 Posts

· Forum Contributor 2017
“I play sax but mostly it plays me”
Joined
·
10,478 Posts
Discussion Starter · #28 ·

· Forum Contributor 2017
“I play sax but mostly it plays me”
Joined
·
10,478 Posts
Discussion Starter · #29 ·
I guess .120 is not that much smaller than a .130 but I would have to use a soft reed.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
26,680 Posts
I can imagine that will such large openings maybe playing further out in the beak makes them more tolerable?
Playing more out on the beak on a large tip piece makes it so that you tend to close off the beak artificially. That can be quite tiring.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,561 Posts
I got into large tips for awhile. I have an RPC rollover that's marked .135 and a high baffle RPC that's marked .145. They have long lays, so are surprisingly easy to play. I stopped playing big tips because I found that I would get my lower lip pinched where the reed meets the mouthpiece. I have a 10mfan robusto 9 in both hr and gold plated brass. Great mouthpieces, but I love how my 8* Marantz slant legacy plays for 1st tenor in a big band.

I tried a Fred Rast .096 scroll shank selmer. Great sound, but exhausting to play. Phil Englemann refaced a Meyer for me at .092. It's a fantastic mouthpiece--the sound is dark but still complex. It works great with combos, but doesn't cut through enough playing lead alto with a big band, so I got a Marantz Meyer at .072.

I prefer smaller tips on soprano and bari.
If Ron marked it .135 it is most likely .150. But I have played one of his .160 pieces and it was surprisingly easy, courtesy of the high baffle (HR but "B-style" baffle epoxied in). It's all in the geometry of the ceiling/baffle and the length of the facing curve. But in the long run it was too much work and I had some TMJ issues already, so no point to layer on to that.

Plas also played mostly bari reeds on tenor, I don't know what facing curve length his pieces had but I'd wager they were longer than the standard 48 or 50, maybe a 54 or longer.
 

· Forum Contributor 2017
“I play sax but mostly it plays me”
Joined
·
10,478 Posts
Discussion Starter · #36 ·
If Ron marked it .135 it is most likely .150. But I have played one of his .160 pieces and it was surprisingly easy, courtesy of the high baffle (HR but "B-style" baffle epoxied in). It's all in the geometry of the ceiling/baffle and the length of the facing curve. But in the long run it was too much work and I had some TMJ issues already, so no point to layer on to that.

Plas also played mostly bari reeds on tenor, I don't know what facing curve length his pieces had but I'd wager they were longer than the standard 48 or 50, maybe a 54 or longer.
The RPC I had was marked.130 but felt like a .090 to me
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
26,680 Posts
21 - 40 of 65 Posts
Top