Sax on the Web Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Distinguished SOTW Member, Forum Contributor 2016
Joined
·
17,960 Posts
It looks like the engraving reads King, no ?

Anyway, King splitbell altos are NOT highly regarded...they have the (unfair IMHO) reputation as having bad intonation, although in my experiences of refurbing around 8 or 9, I have not found their intonation to be any worse nor better than a splitbell Conn or Martin. They sound nice, and the ergos are again no better nor worse than most other splitbell-era horns.

So, anyways...value ? Not much due to that reputation. If it doesn't play up and down, worth perhaps $100-120. If it is in decent playing shape, perhaps $250-300.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
143 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Yeah the engraving looks the same as the early king saxophones. If its not a king stencil then whats up with the serial number
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39 Posts
I know this is a bit older thread, but my guess is someone was being dyslexic, and it's not the serial number, as a bunch of these have NO 1, 549, 911 stamped above the serial number. The silver thumbrest should date this mid to late 20s
 

·
Distinguished SOTW Member/Technician
Joined
·
21,030 Posts
Somehow that serial number looks like it was an amature job and perhaps a property control number.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top