Blow with more air pressure.
straight to the point and funny, but trueGordon (NZ) said:Blow with more air pressure.
straight to the point and funny, but trueGordon (NZ) said:Blow with more air pressure.
That's the solution to 90% of problems on the clarinet, I think.Gordon (NZ) said:Blow with more air pressure.
I agree. And it is amazing how many different ways people can say the same thing, without mentioning air or pressure.dirty said:That's the solution to 90% of problems on the clarinet, I think.
When you play the clarinet right after a sax, you can't help but notice how different the two feel to blow. The sax will take as much air as you can blow through it. There's less resistance. The clarinet kind of has a limit as to how much air can go through at once. A lot of people take this to mean that the clarinet takes less air than the sax. This is not true. The clarinet takes just as much air as a sax, but it needs to be much more focused.MM said:Oh, you mean like "play with warmer air or faster air or" ....?!!!
Yea. That, and a whole lot more, including what dirty said.MM said:Oh, you mean like "play with warmer air or faster air or" ....?!!!
Perhaps I misunderstand what you write, but I think it could b e quite misleading to others:dirty said:...A lot of people take this to mean that the clarinet takes less air than the sax. This is not true. The clarinet takes just as much air as a sax, but it needs to be much more focused.
...
I think what I meant was that the full air column must still be present. I guess what I meant was that your lungs, throat and the entire breathing apparatus must be as filled with air as on a saxophone. The volume of air going in is, obviously, limited by the small bore of the instrument, but up until that point, you must give it a very large volume of air.Gordon (NZ) said:Perhaps I misunderstand what you write, but I think it could b e quite misleading to others:
1. It seems to conflict with the rest of what you wrote.
2. I am currently a very rusty player on all instruments, and have a lung condition which does not help me with long notes, but it is still no problem for me to play to make a mid-range note loudly on clarinet for 50 seconds.
If what you say is correct, it should be easy for me to do the same on sax. But at least for me, it is more difficult on sop sax, and a lot more difficult as the saxes get larger. So I assert that a clarinet uses a less (quantity of) air than sax, especially the larger ones. Even though a higher pressure is usually required on clarinet. An oboe needs even more pressure, but even less air.
Actually that is a lot, especially with your condition. I don't know many players who can play a long note for 50 seconds. I don't know many who can hold their breath for 50 seconds. Natural ability has a lot to do with it. I think the record holder is over 7 minutes and could do about 2-3 minutes on his first tries. Well, there's always circular breathingGordon (NZ) said:I am currently a very rusty player on all instruments, and have a lung condition which does not help me with long notes, but it is still no problem for me to play to make a mid-range note loudly on clarinet for 50 seconds.