Sax on the Web Forum banner

How deep is the animosity between legit and jazz sax teachers, really?

2089 Views 5 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  bertolotti
Hey folks,

this actually kept me up last night, so I hope it's an interesting topic and not just some strange projection of my own.

If you've been following the recent thread--started by Master.America--on the "mouthpiece trick," you may be wondering, like I am, just how deep the animosity between the legit and the jazz schools on key issues like intonation, tone production, etc. really is.

I have no training in either school, although I have a sense that there's a kind of historic division between jazz and classical. I do, however, have a good ear for the kind of spleen major "academic" rifts tend to produce. And, when I see (sorry fellas, no offense intended at all) John and Grumps go at it over this issue, I'm pretty sure I recognize something from my own field.

So how deep is it? What are the key issues? Who are the names to conjure with? What are the fighting words? It would seem that "proper" tone production technique is a key battlefield, but what does it mean to experts and other people "in the know" when, for example, somebody says Dave Liebman, or Santy Runyon, or, indeed, when an innocent naif mentions Rascher?


ps. If I'm way off base, feel free to kick my **s: I'm used to it;)
1 - 1 of 6 Posts
rleitch said:
ps. If I'm way off base, feel free to kick my **s: I'm used to it;)
I seem to recall you're an ESL teacher, right? English Dept.? Yep, you're used to having your a** kicked. Me too!:D
1 - 1 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.