Joined
·
12 Posts
Hi all. I've been reading for a long time on SOTW but have never writen anything. So hello to everyone.I guess then I'm a beginner here. I'd like to have anyone's input on the Keilwerth Tenor sax EX90. I can't afford getting a SX, and I don't really feel like getting a vintage horn, even though I know there are many really good ones out there. I presently have a cheapy horn and would like to get an intermediate one. It'll probably be the last horn I'll ever buy cuz 1st, I've very recently become a father, and secondly, I only play as a hobby. I'd like to one day play some gigs but I wouldn't make a living out of it.
I know some folks are gonna tell me that I should perhaps get a good and affordable student Tawainese or Japanese horn, but I really want something reputable in terms of durability (like from one of the 4 main Sax groups), and I don't really feel like getting a Yani or Yamaha. But here are my real questions: Some people here have mentioned that the series III EX 90 doesn't equal the older series. They attribute this to the possibility that they're now made in the Czech republic (maybe by Amati). I've recently spoken to Mr. Kessler and he told me that they're still made in Germany, and that the myth of the Amati production is false. But he also told me that they are essentially student horns (all of the EX90s). But yet, I've read here that many think that the older series were very close to the SX models (in quality and sound). So what's the deal? Are the III series really made in the Czech republic, and if they're still made in Germany, why don't they stamp it on the back anymore. For such a reputable company, I'd think that they'd be proud to print it on the back of their new serie.
My second question is: Does anyone really know for a fact that the series II was better? Has anyone tried them side by side? I think that Randall has, and he stated that the older ones were definitely better altogether, but he wasn't sure if it was the series I or II also.
I guess I should tell you what kind of music I'm interested in playing so that maybe some of you could tell me what other horns I could consider. I like R&B, R&R, and some Blues. I know I know, the old Kings and Martins and Bueschers were really good for that. And I know many will say that it's actually the mouthpiece that counts. And I agree totally. But I'd like to get a new horn, and I think that some horns do have slightly brighter or darker sounds than others. I guess I want something that's really meatty and roaring, regardless of the mouthpiece.
So please, if anyone could inform me about the EX 90s. And if you want, you could tell me what other horns you believe could be best for the music I like. Please keep in mind that all I could find in my city (Montreal) in terms of new horns are Jupiter, Antigua, Yamaha, Keilwerth, Selmer (both Paris and US), and Yani (901 only). All others are cheapies. Thnx a bunch to all who can help.
I know some folks are gonna tell me that I should perhaps get a good and affordable student Tawainese or Japanese horn, but I really want something reputable in terms of durability (like from one of the 4 main Sax groups), and I don't really feel like getting a Yani or Yamaha. But here are my real questions: Some people here have mentioned that the series III EX 90 doesn't equal the older series. They attribute this to the possibility that they're now made in the Czech republic (maybe by Amati). I've recently spoken to Mr. Kessler and he told me that they're still made in Germany, and that the myth of the Amati production is false. But he also told me that they are essentially student horns (all of the EX90s). But yet, I've read here that many think that the older series were very close to the SX models (in quality and sound). So what's the deal? Are the III series really made in the Czech republic, and if they're still made in Germany, why don't they stamp it on the back anymore. For such a reputable company, I'd think that they'd be proud to print it on the back of their new serie.
My second question is: Does anyone really know for a fact that the series II was better? Has anyone tried them side by side? I think that Randall has, and he stated that the older ones were definitely better altogether, but he wasn't sure if it was the series I or II also.
I guess I should tell you what kind of music I'm interested in playing so that maybe some of you could tell me what other horns I could consider. I like R&B, R&R, and some Blues. I know I know, the old Kings and Martins and Bueschers were really good for that. And I know many will say that it's actually the mouthpiece that counts. And I agree totally. But I'd like to get a new horn, and I think that some horns do have slightly brighter or darker sounds than others. I guess I want something that's really meatty and roaring, regardless of the mouthpiece.
So please, if anyone could inform me about the EX 90s. And if you want, you could tell me what other horns you believe could be best for the music I like. Please keep in mind that all I could find in my city (Montreal) in terms of new horns are Jupiter, Antigua, Yamaha, Keilwerth, Selmer (both Paris and US), and Yani (901 only). All others are cheapies. Thnx a bunch to all who can help.