My experience has been just the opposite. To me, the Venn G2 feels like a completely different reed compared to the Venn G1.1 (the slightly improved version of the original). My G2 is a 2.5 for alto, and it's very free-blowing -- practically Forestone-like in its immediate response, especially compared to the sluggish G1.1. This 2.5 is definitely softer than the G1.1 2.5, and may even be a bit softer than the G1.1 2.0. The G2 also has more even response from top to bottom. The annoying extra layer of low-end resistance that characterized earlier Venns is gone.I just got the Gen2 2.5 from Kessler. I’m not too pleased. It plays much too hard… feels like a 3.5 not a 2.5. I’m thinking of trying the trick mentioned in another thread about dipping a synthetic reed in boiling water to soften it.
I tested the G2 2.5 on my Selmer Series III with three different classical alto mouthpieces: my usual Yanagisawa AC150, a Selmer Concept, and a D'Addario D155. I never thought I'd say this about a Venn, but with the Yany, my lowest-resistance mp, the G2 2.5 was almost too responsive -- a little brighter and edgier than I prefer. The G1.1 is definitely darker. However, the easier-blowing G2 made the Venn + Concept and Venn + D155 combos playable for me, which wasn't the case with the G1.1. (It was sadly ironic that D'Addario's own mouthpiece worked so poorly with its own synthetic reed.) The overall resistance profile of the Concept with this reed is still not perfect for me, but I that's because of the mouthpiece. I've always liked the sound of the Concept, but the feel has never been quite right. But the D155 pairs pretty well with the G2 2.5. As for the AC150, I may try the Venn G2 3.0 and see how that works.