Sax on the Web Forum banner
1 - 20 of 46 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I may be "doing it wrong" (if there is a better subforum for this). And my intention's not to be controversial, or stir up controversy.

I was inspired to do this because I just got a call from a dad with a son he wanted to bring in to shop for a saxophone. The order of topics upon answering the phone:

- He wants to bring his son in to buy a saxophone
- He will be driving 2.5 hours to get to Santa Cruz
- Am I open for business today?
- Do I have saxophones ready for sale to him?

This was all upon my answering, before my saying anything but, "Hello, Just Saxes."

The rest of the call was unpleasant, because I'm practicing max precautions as I see fit, and he's doing the opposite (as he sees fit). Thinking about it afterward made me think to post a thread like this, in the interest of sharing information that I wish he had seen, in some way, before calling me.

Like most of CA, save the places that are opening up as normally "with distancing," I'm open for "curbside service."

What that means:

- I'm open, but not for appointments. No one is in my shop except me. Ever. Not even family. No appointments, no repair-while-you-wait-and-chat. *Why?* I have clients of all ages, quite a few over age 65, and I want them both to know that their risk is reduced to the absolute minimum that I can reduce it to, by having only myself in my shop. No other person -- no one -- is allowed in my shop at any time, until there are reliable treatments for the virus and/or a reliable vaccine. I am fortunate to have, at my shop, relatively low foot traffic in the area and a very good spot, outside the shop, for "distanced" payment and hand-off of purchases. Since I have that, I don't see a reason to increase risk to myself -- or from myself to others -- as it just isn't necessary. Purchases can be completed outdoors, where transmission risk is lower than indoors, without any practical differences except for things seeming different from normal when the changes are only that: 1) no playtesting before purchase is happening, and 2) there isn't the *feeling* of being welcomed into a personal/aesthetic space that is normally part of the experience of shopping. I would rather visit, and warmly, but the impetus to eliminate unnecessary risks outweighs that, to me. Both in-person and mail-order customers benefit from this precaution, whether they desire it or not.

- I would rather everybody playtest on the spot, in front of me. There are multiple reasons for that. It isn't practical right now, for some of the reasons above and some that are known but probably pointless to discuss. The more important detail, possibly of use to others: what I'm doing, to make up for the lack of an opportunity to playtest is allowing for a more liberal return window than normal. Normal is 14 days from receipt if purchasing by mail. It is more liberal than that, right now. I don't want to get into the details, because I don't want to open myself up to abuse via this policy, but the same applies to in-person purchases. There is always a return window, it's just different now from normal to account for lacking the opportunity, mutually, for in-person playtesting at the shop.

- I'm taking repair work, but it sits for 9 days before I touch it. The hand-off happens "curbside," and I take the horn directly to a storage that only I access, where it sits for 9 days, untouched, before I bring it back to the shop and open the case. SARS was known to live up to 29 days on stainless steel under idea laboratory conditions. The general advisements from CDC and WHO seem to be that 9 days is sort of a conservative, safe estimate for longer survival times on stainless steel and plastic for Covid-19. I will *have* to play the horn when I work on it. Normally, I can sometimes leave the work as technical only (unplayed during or after working) if the player will be picking up in person and playtesting before leaving the shop. Since that latter is impossible with current precautions, it is impossible for me not to play before considering any job finished. I represent a potential threat to every customer, never mind every person I contact, as I increase my potential exposure. To limit it by not taking chances on transfer seems an obvious consideration, to me. So that is the policy: 9 days before I work on anything, minimum, after receiving it, and nothing even enters my shop from outside without this quarantining in the storage space before it does.

- After I complete work, I do two things that are not normally (but probably should have been) part of the final work on every horn: 1) wash the nedk's interior and exterior with dishsoap and water, 2) run hot air both over the outside of the body and through the interior of the body after it has had time to dry out. I mask up and wear gloves, hands sanitized before putting the gloves on (yes, while alone in the shop) before this. The finished horn in the case goes into a cardboard box and is sealed, and that is what's handed off when the customer comes to pick up. The client has the option of having me hold the horn in that condition -- boxed -- for up to 14 days if they like. That is so that the horn has time to "self-sanitize" in the box with minimal exposure to "droplets," and time for any cooties that may be on the horn to die. As most probably know, the recommended wait time for cardboard is about 24 hours. That is why I box all jobs, now, i.e. that after the 24 hours, with all this info on hand, the customer can make her/his own choice about how long to wait before opening the case.

That's not everything, but it's most of it.

I'm not trying to tell people what to do, or trying to start a big argument about what is or isn't a reasonable policy. Just sharing what I'm doing in case it's of use, and in case that father should need a detailed explanation. I found the call annoying and aggravating enough that I don't want to call that person back and explain because I'm quite certain he's not interested in hearing it.

This is just what I'm doing, and is shared in the interest of being useful in this nutjob time.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
I know people will suspect this is an advertisement. It's not. I don't need more work. I'm content with the speed and rhythm of work obligations, and the shutdown doesn't really affect me much financially. Even my moonlighting gig (I make surfboards, for the pleasure of it, and that is a small side biz) is "distanced" as far as the actual work.

My agenda is more that I felt not-understood by the father, and open discussion at large is a contribution I can make to reducing the prevalence of that (at large, which eventually filters back to me).
 

· Forum Contributor 2008-2017
Joined
·
667 Posts
You're doing the right thing. We've lost our immediate neighbor to COVID-19. He was an energetic, active cyclist, engineer, and saxophonist as well. He fell ill, tested positive on a Thursday, and died the following Monday night. Needless to say, our family and the other close neighbors were shocked.

Be safe, both you and your customers.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
You're doing the right thing. We've lost our immediate neighbor to COVID-19. He was an energetic, active cyclist, engineer, and saxophonist as well. He fell ill, tested positive on a Thursday, and died the following Monday night. Needless to say, our family and the other close neighbors were shocked.

Be safe, both you and your customers.
So sorry to hear that, Sidepipes. That is awful. AWFUL. You're not far from home for me, either Santa Cruz or the residence I keep in Palo Alto, where I grew up.

You, too: good luck and hang in there.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
283 Posts
If I understand correctly:
You have a business that you are currently running alone.
You are making choices about how to run your business.
Some of those choices involve extra work and effort on your part (without additional remuneration) so as to do what you think is respecting some of your clients' concerns, and all that you know to do to not act as a vector of a potentially life-threatening illness to them.
You've given extensive thought to those choices and the reasons behind them and can articulate them effectively.
You got a call from a potential new customer that you "found [the call] annoying and aggravating enough that [you[ don't want to call that person back and explain because [you're] quite certain he's not interested in hearing it."
Put another way, perhaps you are considering limiting your customers to people that you feel good about interacting with.
It sounds like you have "the serenity to accept the things (that you) cannot change;
courage to change the things (that you) can; and wisdom to know the difference."
To me it is a refreshing attitude, one that I gather that people pray for. I hope that you enjoy every day and share that with people that appreciate what you're doing and treat you with that appreciation. I hope that appreciation gives you the energy to keep on using your skills and keeping that cycle going.
 

· Registered
Cannonball Vintage Reborn Tenor Sax with Cannonball 5J HR & Otto Link STM NY 7.
Joined
·
954 Posts
I have two points on this subject:
1) It is your shop and your business. You absolutely must run it as you see fit. Your thoughts and how you arrived at your decision are also your own. I am not suggesting that you ought not tell your story to your customers or explain your procedures. But, really, it is your shop. You must run it.
2) Every decision any person makes can bring objections from others. People are all different and have varying degrees of interest or knowledge of your business. What is troubling to you seems to be that someone could come to a different decision than your own. To this point, when you make a decision, you really need to stand on it. It does not mean you do not care about what others are saying. It simply means you have made a choice and direction. People object to the most obvious things, including whether it is day or night. I worked retail for 18 years. People are going to object. They are just being people. As are you just being who you are.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,836 Posts
There are a few saxophone shops around where I live that are presently closed to customers but are opening soon. None of them are allowing handling or playing horns and they are still working on their policies for repairs. I need my horn repaired but I don’t expect anybody to want to welcome me into their workshops, and I’m not that comfortable about it myself, so I’m doing what I can and waiting, anything else strikes me as unreasonable bordering on the stupid. Having been in lockdown for three months and been careful and considerate of others I’m quite leery of just bouncing back to business as usual, it’s not the time.

You’re doing exactly what you consider to be right, and you are right. Someone said something on a post here a long time ago about something completely unrelated but it’s always stayed with me, they said “it’s only music, it’s not life and death”, Covid 19 on the other hand could be life and death.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
2,930 Posts
I respect a person can run their business however they want. However the model practiced by the OP would no be conducive to sales. I wouldn't do business with someone operating that way, especially if I was driving 2.5hrs. Its all hysteria to me.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,740 Posts
I think you're erring on the side of caution, and I respect that decision, especially since it is likely to cost you some money, as in this particular sale that appears likely not to happen. It's clearly your right to conduct your business as you see fit, and you're to be commended for having put a lot of thought into the public health aspect of all this.

I can't understand how a customer could complain. I'm sure there are other shops they can go to if they don't like what you're doing (especially if they're willing to travel 2.5 hours) and they can always buy online. They're not entitled to tell you how to run your business or give you grief about it.

All that said, and even speaking as someone who takes the pandemic very seriously, and with all due respect, I do think some of what you're doing is a little extreme. For example, letting a horn sit for 9 days is, according to the best info I've seen, at least 5 days longer than necessary. But, as I said, you're erring on the side of caution, which is a good thing in most ways.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Mlucky, IMO if you err enough on the side of caution, it'll always be "overkill" in someone's mind, but if you err enough then no harm no foul, because the measure of erring enough is not having caused harm, or having stood as a link in a chain of infection that led to someone's unnecessary, premature death (though we don't get to know, in the end, what the final "score" is there). The measure of not being careful enough (again, unknowable as a "score" item) is that you did harm someone, or did transmit to someone who transmitted to someone (etc.) that died, where if you had broken the chain of infection that person would have to have died due to some other cause (or a different infection chain, since your line is broken). If you do enough, you'll always have done somewhat more than necessary, because you're never going to do "the perfect amount" because that point is too small and finite. (IMO, but not just IMO -- Fauci has addressed this subject the same way.)

saxcop - you and I both know you never, ever address me, or anything I post, with goodwill. You've been resentful for 20 years, and you tried to get over it once, but with no input from me it turned out the resentment returned on its own. I'm going to put you on ignore (I think I had you there, before, and the status got erased or lost somehow) and I hope you will do the same for me (i.e. put me on ignore). I'm asking this publicly, so that people know if you continue to harrass me that I made an effort to end it, here, now, in this thread, and you are carrying it on all on your own. I'm not interested in interacting with you, or being unconsciously trolled by you (I don't think you are self-aware of what you're doing, I think that you are compelled, unconsciously). So please put me on ignore. It's in everybody's best interest, not least of all yours. Let's just avoid each other. I don't see where interacting is of any benefit to either of us. You are on ignore now, and hopefully this will be the last time I ever address you, here.

JimD, Zoot, Ix - I was genuinely trying to steer clear of this (lol) but I can pretty concretely trace the evolution of my own policy going back to early March (I had to self-quarantine for 6 weeks beginning Feb 28, which gave me a lot of time to read and look into things. Some of you know that I have an academic background (postgrad, NYU, Liberal Arts/American Studies) so pursuing info is 2nd nature to me; plus, as JimD pointed out, and as I already accepted from mid-February, it was information pertaining to life and death questions -- not just generally, but for my mother who is over 80, and my neighbor (at home) who shares a lot of space with me and is 76+ years old. The information changed a lot, over time, and some early conclusions and results are contradicted by later experiments and results.

These links basically are, IMO, where most of the information you see being recirculated, without citations, by media outlets originate -- the last link seems to be where most of the recommendations circulating now are anchored:

This is not the 1st article I encountered about SARS-2 and surfaces. There was an earlier one either in JAMA or THE LANCET, but I can't find it right now. This could be a revision of it, because it shares some of the same weird features (testing the virus's survival rate in a hostile environment -- as the study itself determines -- rather than in a range of environments, or even in a static, less patently hostile environment (since SARS 1 was established to survive "up to weeks," and as long as 28 or 29 days under ideal conditions). The f***ed up thing about that is that when recommendations are extrapolated from the immediate findings of this study, they are based on virus-hostile conditions. Conditions in my home and shop are often much less hostile than the lab conditions in this study, hence my initial policies based on readings of this were conservative, and longer than the findings in the paper, because the actual conditions I'm working under are often cooler than 72 degrees, which is more friendly to the virus than the conditions in the experiment:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30003-3/fulltext

Along with CDC and WHO monitoring (these outlets goofed early on, but their coverage improved over time, and in March they were two of the best sources for basic information an emerging recommendations) I used a lot of university sites' health department and medical and science department pages and information. Their concerns are the same as mine, on a much greater scale, with much greater impact on society at large than me, or any small business, so this type of site was a very useful reference point both for emerging (not ignorant) consensus on policy and points of interest for further investigation:

https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-basics

^ I had a lot of those university pages of that type bookmarked, early on. Their information was constantly changing, evolving, and improving, and the Stanford website in my area in particular was indispensable as far as having some non-mass-mediated source to indicate what kind of research and public health programs were ongoing, and when for example different types of testing might roll out.

This seems to be the most current, most recent study on surfaces, infection, and spread, to which a lot of recent recommendations and public policy are anchored, and which informs them:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2004973

I posted what I'm doing because it's clear to me -- having dual residences and ties to Santa Clara County and Santa Cruz County -- that "peer pressure" is the primary force driving community wide practices. Santa Clara, for the past month or two, now has a lower per capita Covid death rate than Santa Cruz County, but Santa Clara also has much better, much more widespread, much more thorough precautions and practices. That Santa Clara was the original Wuhan of CA, and had large scale, cluster-driven outbreaks -- very few residents of Santa Clara have more than 1 "degree of separation" from a known Covid case at a child's school, a workplace colleague, a coworker in a professional network, because of the size of the inital outbreak. That surely informs the continued vigilance in that area, though its rate of infection (indicated by the death rate per capita) is now lower than in Santa Cruz where the first cluster-driven outbreaks may just be developing now, in the wake of Mother's Day clusters in Watsonville and emerging spread that media outlets are crediting to Memorial Day celebrations. Precautions in Santa Cruz are terrible. If you drive along the ocean today, you might see masks around the necks of maybe 3 of 20 people, and in 20 you are unlikely to see any one actually wearing the mask over their face; it will be around their necks. You probably have to see 50 people, on average, to see 3 that actually have a mask on, which completely negates the purpose of wearing a mask in the first place. This "rebellious" approach is purely a function of "peer pressure" and conformity, IMO.

That's why I made my original post. If "peer pressure" is the main thing driving actions and inactions, it's important to put my POV into the conversation, since it is generally missing, and I know for a fact (because I get the emails, behind the scenes, from music distributors) it is underrepresented here.

My policy and attitude are mild compared to some in the emails I've been receiving. They don't post those things here, even when the senders are participants here for obvious reasons.

Saxbass - I've never been in AA, but I've been to meetings, thanks to a close friend being 23 years sober, now. He assures me that I can try to bestow the title on myself of alcoholic, but it is folly, he says, "You were just a drunk." But I dig the 12 steps, and believe "working them" could benefit any person. A lot people have a lot of coping mechanisms wrong (e.g. isolating when depressed, rather than making a point of going out and doing something beneficial to someonen else), and that that causes a lot of harm. The 12 steps are bad*ssed, imo.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
2,930 Posts
Palo you consistently just don't like when someone doesn't agree with you. Nothing I said in this thread is offensive. I said I respect your right to handle your business how you feel and I state how I feel about businesses that do it your way.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
As above, I can't see your posts any more. I'm going to imagine that you were offended, but agreed that mutual "ignore" detente struck you as making sense.

I don't wish any ill upon you. I just don't see where any interaction makes any sense for you, me, or the board.

Good luck to you.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,690 Posts
"saxcop - you and I both know you never, ever address me, or anything I post, with goodwill. You've been resentful for 20 years, and you tried to get over it once, but with no input from me it turned out the resentment returned on its own. I'm going to put you on ignore (I think I had you there, before, and the status got erased or lost somehow) and I hope you will do the same for me (i.e. put me on ignore). I'm asking this publicly, so that people know if you continue to harrass me that I made an effort to end it, here, now, in this thread, and you "are carrying it on all on your own. I'm not interested in interacting with you, or being unconsciously trolled by you (I don't think you are self-aware of what you're doing, I think that you are compelled, unconsciously). So please put me on ignore. It's in everybody's best interest, not least of all yours. Let's just avoid each other. I don't see where interacting is of any benefit to either of us. You are on ignore now, and hopefully this will be the last time I ever address you, here."


CRAZY!.....This is why I don't spend much time here. Too many of these kinds of people. 20 years of trolling. There needs to be a delete and block funcition. Dr. G is another member like this. He posts on everyones thread. He'll be rude and then nice. He'll be a be subsversive and then helpful. He will continue to post on your threads solicit horns via pm after you've repeatedly told him to stop. How does he have the time to post on everyone's threads? To boot I don't think he can even play. I put him on ignore but I can still see that he is responding. Without a viable block feature a few old trolls with nothing but time on their hands can ruin everyone's experience here.
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
14,451 Posts
As others have said, its your shop. You accept the rewards and consequences. Its obvious you are aware your practice will cost you some customers and you have accepted that as part of your policy decision. My hat is off to you. Be safe, live long and prosper...etc...
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member
Joined
·
2,930 Posts
". Dr. G is another member like this. He posts on everyones thread. He'll be rude and then nice. He'll be a be subsversive and then helpful. He will continue to post on your threads solicit horns via pm after you've repeatedly told him to stop. How does he have the time to post on everyone's threads? To boot I don't think he can even play. I put him on ignore but I can still see that he is responding. Without a viable block feature a few old trolls with nothing but time on their hands can ruin everyone's experience here.
Of course if Palo said it must be true. He has a great imagination. I agree you should spend less time here. This is a discussion forum. If you post a long dribble, you shouldn't be surprised if someone responds. I do agree with you about Dr. G
 

· Distinguished SOTW Member, Forum Contributor 2015-
Joined
·
38,839 Posts
I respect a person can run their business however they want. However the model practiced by the OP would no be conducive to sales. I wouldn't do business with someone operating that way, especially if I was driving 2.5hrs. Its all hysteria to me.
I wouldn't buy a horn from someone, such as you, Saxcop, that so blatantly does not care about my health or my family.
 
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top