Joined
·
1,071 Posts
From real book- Footprints my best shot is-b c# d# e f g# a b d so I went down a 1/2 step on 5 and up 1/2 step on 9 ?? correct ?
That seems very confusing. Learn the chord tones thoroughly, then try adding passing notes. This is way better than trying to find a scale to "fit". How do the chord tones resolve? ie, look at the voice leading.Thanks! See it now, Jamey notes it as B 7 +9- in Real Book it is " B 7 b5 (#9)" a little confusing OK now .
Exactly. Learn to improvise in an intervalic fashion, not a scalar fashion. And thats not to say you will NOT play scales. But if you appraoch improvisation from a perspective of what scale do I play over this chord and what scale do i play over that chord, in the absence of true intervallic understanding (chordal) then your history.That seems very confusing. Learn the chord tones thoroughly, then try adding passing notes. This is way better than trying to find a scale to "fit". How do the chord tones resolve? ie, look at the voice leading.
This is where you went wrong from the start. By spelling out a scale instead of the chord. I guess I'm just repeating what everyone has said in this thread so far, but you really want to start with the chord itself; the actual chord tones.my best shot is-b c# d# e f g# a b d so I went down a 1/2 step on 5 and up 1/2 step on 9 ?? correct ?
You can't exactly apply logic to a lot of Wayne Shorter's compositions. He doesn't exactly follow the "rules". Often times you just have to approach chords individually without trying to related them to the key, the preceding chord, or the following chord.The preceding measure is F# 7 +9 as mentioned before, the chord after this is D minor 7. I am learning- but now again confused-how can a measure say B7alt and be "operating in D minor ?
That's right. There are (at least) two lessons here:You can't exactly apply logic to a lot of Wayne Shorter's compositions. He doesn't exactly follow the "rules". Often times you just have to approach chords individually without trying to related them to the key, the preceding chord, or the following chord.
Well said! This quote should probably preceed every music theory discussion on here.Start at the beginning, get familiar with the rules and get gradually more complex before trying to understand and play the stuff that is either complex or completely breaks any rules.
See now, there's a real musician for you. Trickster!. . . or you can just pick a couple of tones from that chord, play them, and you're already on to the next set of changes before anyone knows what happened. :mrgreen:
Just to expand on gary's excellent response slightly, I'll add something that some here may or may not agree with (feel free to discuss).. . . or you can just pick a couple of tones from that chord, play them, and you're already on to the next set of changes before anyone knows what happened. :mrgreen:
This is pretty cool. But I wonder why they notate a C7 chord as C E G A# (A# instead of Bb) and, even worse, Cmi7 as C D# G A#. I realize they are enharmonic spellings, but why show a b7 as #6 and b3 as #2? I find that curiously disturbing.And for those that don't like to think that hard: http://www.musicopedia.com/chords/0-piano.php
I agree JL.This is pretty cool. But I wonder why they notate a C7 chord as C E G A# (A# instead of Bb) and, even worse, Cmi7 as C D# G A#. I realize they are enharmonic spellings, but why show a b7 as #6 and b3 as #2? I find that curiously disturbing.