Sax on the Web Forum banner

big bore/big chamber, small bore/small chamber?

1933 Views 14 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  bfoster64
I've noticed while trying out mouthpieces, that there is a big difference between my old Selmer Signet and my new Chicago Jazz Series in responsiveness with the same mouthpiece.

My own BergLarsen Steel 115/2/SMS responds great on the Selmer, but is more difficult to play, especially in the low register, on my CJS. The sound is great, but it requires a lot more control.

On the other hand, trying a Lebayle jazz (great mouthpiece by the way!) I noticed it played beautifully on my CJS, but had a boring sound on my Selmer. I didn't buy it (yet), I want to try out some other ones before getting me a new mouthpiece. But it's defenitely a candidate, more than the dukoff I tried (honkin' only), or the Meyer (far too classical for me)

I believed I read something here about an influence of the bore on the size of the chamber optimal for that saxophone. Is there any mouthpiece specialist willing to shine a light on this? It would help me in my search for a new mpc, as it can narrow the search.

Thank you in advance.
1 - 1 of 15 Posts
I'm not a mouthpiece expert, but I've heard the big bore/big chamber, small bore/small chamber advice from a few sources, including Patrick Springer at http://www.springermpc.com/mpcprof.html. See Patrick's comments about the Hard Rubber Tenor versus the Rollover Tenor.
1 - 1 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top