Hello, friends.
There is a music store in my neighborhood, that has a "clearance" table. I often find useful reeds of odd strengths, brand new and in the box, for about half the normal price. Sometimes the strengths are actually useful to me, albeit not always my preferred strength or brand, so I buy them.
Then I noticed that the design on the box is typically different from that of the ones on clearance, meaning that they are all from older stock, typically about two years old, I guess, but occasionally even ten years old, judging from how the design has faded in a few rare cases.
At any rate, my question is this: all other factors equal (e.g., brand, strength, cut, size), and assuming that there are no major manufacturing changes within the same brand and strength, are unused reeds from old stock, inherently any less useful than unused reeds from brand-new stock? In other words, do they break down after a few years, dry out, crack, fail to last, or else have other issues that I should be aware of, before I continue to buy old stock on clearance?
(I am currently switching from years of synthetic to cane, so I am still on a quest for the right make and strength, and also for the right mouthpiece, so I still have to try different strengths and brands anyway, to a point. I even find the orange-box Ricos useful, so far. This is not to say that I am asking for advice on this thread regarding brands of reed or mouthpiece, for the sake of sticking to the subject, but just to point out the reason that I would buy different brands and strengths at this time, rather than sticking to only one.)
There is a music store in my neighborhood, that has a "clearance" table. I often find useful reeds of odd strengths, brand new and in the box, for about half the normal price. Sometimes the strengths are actually useful to me, albeit not always my preferred strength or brand, so I buy them.
Then I noticed that the design on the box is typically different from that of the ones on clearance, meaning that they are all from older stock, typically about two years old, I guess, but occasionally even ten years old, judging from how the design has faded in a few rare cases.
At any rate, my question is this: all other factors equal (e.g., brand, strength, cut, size), and assuming that there are no major manufacturing changes within the same brand and strength, are unused reeds from old stock, inherently any less useful than unused reeds from brand-new stock? In other words, do they break down after a few years, dry out, crack, fail to last, or else have other issues that I should be aware of, before I continue to buy old stock on clearance?
(I am currently switching from years of synthetic to cane, so I am still on a quest for the right make and strength, and also for the right mouthpiece, so I still have to try different strengths and brands anyway, to a point. I even find the orange-box Ricos useful, so far. This is not to say that I am asking for advice on this thread regarding brands of reed or mouthpiece, for the sake of sticking to the subject, but just to point out the reason that I would buy different brands and strengths at this time, rather than sticking to only one.)