Ol Danl
06-02-2004, 01:57 AM
Well, maybe this ought to be under repair, but its a flute question -- or maybe I ought to direct it to a really good flute forum, but there doesn't seem to be one. I bought a beater flute on ebay the other day-- I want to try to learn to work on them a good bit more than I can now. Anyway, I got an old Artley Symphony flute, hoping (but not really expecting) the original silver head to still be there (for only $30). Of course, its not the original headjoint, and even the footjoint is not an Artley. Looks kinda like the school that owned this thing took a bunch of broken up flutes to a repair guy and he made this one out of 2 or 3 of them. But I've taped over the trill key tone hole that's missing a pad, and rebent a couple of springs, and it will play down to low c -- with some understandable fuzziness. I was hoping I could describe this foot and head and get some of you who do repairs to speculate on what flute they came from -- I don't know, it would just be interesting to know. Here goes:
Foot -- The toneholes are the opposite of the Artley's rolled ones. They're actually stepped -- thinner where they meet the pad. And while I've never had the opportunity to examine a flute with soldered tone holes, these look sort of like they are -- both inside and out. The d# key spatula has this squarish extension sticking down, so that it only needs a thin cork. The foot has its serial number stamped along the length of the tube -- "BN 9832". The ring-shaped stampings in the keys are smaller in diameter than the Artley''s.
Headjoint -- Not much remarkable. It is plated. It is also some 8-10 mm longer than the ones on my old student Artley or either of my Gemeinhardts. Length without the crown is about 226-227 mm compared to the 216-217 of the other 3. The crown is no clue -- they've used the Artley there. Actually they've had to deform the old Artley case to get the headjoint in there.
The Artley body is S/N 75xxx. My old student flute is a 74xxx, so I have a pretty direct comparison, and its just obvious these are not the originals. Any ideas? :shock:
Foot -- The toneholes are the opposite of the Artley's rolled ones. They're actually stepped -- thinner where they meet the pad. And while I've never had the opportunity to examine a flute with soldered tone holes, these look sort of like they are -- both inside and out. The d# key spatula has this squarish extension sticking down, so that it only needs a thin cork. The foot has its serial number stamped along the length of the tube -- "BN 9832". The ring-shaped stampings in the keys are smaller in diameter than the Artley''s.
Headjoint -- Not much remarkable. It is plated. It is also some 8-10 mm longer than the ones on my old student Artley or either of my Gemeinhardts. Length without the crown is about 226-227 mm compared to the 216-217 of the other 3. The crown is no clue -- they've used the Artley there. Actually they've had to deform the old Artley case to get the headjoint in there.
The Artley body is S/N 75xxx. My old student flute is a 74xxx, so I have a pretty direct comparison, and its just obvious these are not the originals. Any ideas? :shock: