I have never met anyone who wanted to have a "bad" sound. We describe tone qualities in many ways, most of which do not have anything to do with music. We use terms like
"Velvet", "Dark Chocolate", "Bright", "Cutting", etc. These terms are of little use to a beginner as they have no point of
reference. For beginners, I have found that the best helpers in developing tone quality are the physical actions of producing a
sound and taking to heart the words of one of my old teacher Joe Christensen. "If it looks right
and they are doing the right things, then eventually, it will
sound right." It does take time to develop good tone quality as
it is dependent upon several physical and mental factors.
Embouchure. Formation of the embouchure
for saxophone and clarinet is very similar. The concept that was discussed in "sucking your thumb" is an excellent place to start
and one that I have taken to heart in my beginning instruction.
Generally, the clarinet embouchure is more "rigid" in its
formation and there is one very important difference. I use the
following description: "The clarinet mouthpiece is designed to be
blown ‘across’ and the saxophone mouthpiece is
designed to be blown ‘through’." Simply stated, the
clarinet mouthpiece enters the mouth more on the vertical plane
and the saxophone mouthpiece more on the horizontal. For both
instruments, it is important to hold the head up so that the
difference can be seen. A clarinet player with their head down
will, in actuality, have the mouthpiece going almost straight
into their mouth. The straight Soprano Saxophone is not held like
a clarinet.
That being said, I’ve
developed/borrowed/stolen several exercises that help to build
the necessary strength in the embouchure to control the sound.
The first is a variation on "sucking your thumb". Have the
student suck on their thumb hard. When the chin comes down and
the corners of the mouth firm up, have them hold it there for 10
seconds and then relax. Yes, it’s an isometric exercise for
the mouth. Repeat this 3 or 4 times each session for the first
few weeks and stress the importance of keeping the "shape" of the
mouth the same when blowing. Remember to keep the angle of the
mouthpiece correct for the instrument in question. It is very,
very important to stress fundamentals in each lesson for the
first few weeks. I use "key phrases" that have been explained in
great detail to check these items.
Failure to put the top teeth on the mouthpiece. This is a
very common error with beginners and must be emphasized
constantly.
No more than half of the bottom lip over
the teeth. This varies slightly from student to student but
is a good rule of thumb.
Corners of the mouth held firm. This is
key on every instrument.
Chin held flat. This, I believe is more
critical on the clarinet than on the saxophone, but it is
generally agreed that a collapsed chin is bad on every woodwind
except bassoon.
After a while, it is possible to do these
checks with the words "Teeth", "Lip", "Corners", and "Chin". It
takes almost no time and is worth the effort. Often, rather than
saying "One, two, ready, play", I’ll say "Teeth, Lip,
Corners, Chin". (I have other nifty things to reinforce hand
position, posture, and air speed.) Prior to beginning on the
instrument, we do spend some time, perhaps a week, playing on
just the mouthpiece. I do this because, without the instrument
complicating things, the correct positioning of the mouthpiece is
easier to accomplish. During this time, we will begin playing
rhythmic figures and establishing articulation practices. Playing
time will be interspersed with rhythmic drills, which will far
exceed their technical ability to actually perform and with
breath control exercises (see Breath Support below).
The starting note on the instrument
doesn’t really matter that much. I’ve known teachers
to start clarinets on 4th line "D" to ensure good hand position
from the beginning. I do like to use some note that has fingers
down as it helps kids hold the instrument. I like 4th line "D"
for the saxophones and "Open G", with the right hand down, for
the clarinets.
As soon as a sound is being produced which is
generally characteristic, I teach the students fingerings for the
"F" Concert Scale and we begin to play it, descending only, as a
long tone exercise--usually beginning with 8 beats (beat=60 mm)
per note with 2 beats rest between notes. As soon as possible, we
begin to play with no rests and slurring to develop the concept
of not stopping the air between notes. This takes us to the
second physical area of tone production.
Breath Support. This seems to be one of
the most confusing areas for beginning students. I believe that
the "wind" in wind instruments actually is a two part thing. The
two parts are air speed and air volume or "how fast and how
much".
The speed of the air, in my opinion, is what
most effects tone quality while the actual amount of air into the
instrument determines the volume of sound. This is where the old
adage of "It’s harder to play with a good sound softly"
comes from. I ask students which will shoot water the farthest, a
garden hose or a fire hose. Most all will say that the fire hose
will shoot the farthest and, of course, they are wrong. Given the
same relative pressure at the end of the hose, both will shoot
water the same distance (speed). The difference, of course is the
amount of water (volume) on the target. These concepts can be
quite confusing for beginners.
Therefore, I link them together in the
beginning by encouraging students to play with pretty strong
volume, which encourages good air speed. The key here is strength
in the embouchure to control the pressure and amount of air. If
the embouchure collapses, then that’s too loud. I equate
the formation of the embouchure to the nozzle on the end of that
garden or fire hose. It must be strong enough to control the
pressure of the water/air trying to come through. This also helps
them to understand the forward focus and shape of the embouchure.
I’ve found a couple of easy/fun ways to help students
understand the concepts of "air under pressure" as they relate to
playing a wind instrument.
The first is simply blowing up balloons. I use
9" (23 cm) party balloons and we spend time blowing them up in
one breath. What makes it different is that the student is
required to "hold" the embouchure while blowing and is only
allowed to use one breath. The resistance of the balloon forces
the student to feel the tension in the abdominal area where
breath support begins. It also tends, for some reason, to promote
a relaxed, open throat. (I try to not mention the throat unless
it appears to be a problem with a specific student) This has
proven to be an enjoyable way to begin classes. Be prepared for
the laughter at the sound of the air being released from the
balloon and for the excitement when someone looses control of
their balloon and it goes flying around the room. However, both
of these offer opportunity for teaching that the sound/flying is
being caused by the air leaving the balloon under pressure, or
being forced from the balloon by the "muscles" of the
balloon.
The second exercise stresses the same things
with different "props". I have the students tear/cut a letter
sized piece of paper into 4 equal parts. Then we pull the music
stand up until the middle of the stand is at "mouth level". With
the stand tilted to vertical, have the students slide forward in
their chair so that their mouth is about 3-4 inches (8-10 cm)
from the stand. Have them place the paper on the stand and hold
it in place by blowing on it. This cannot be done without
adequate air pressure (breath support). The upside of this
exercise as opposed to balloons is that paper is cheap. The
downside is that, since paper is cheap, students tend to leave it
all over the floor.
The third exercise emphasizes the importance
of a steady stream of air and also uses paper as a prop. The
letter size paper is cut lengthwise into 2 inch (5 cm) strips.
The students are to hold the paper just below the aperture of the
lips and by blowing, cause the paper to rise and stay in one
position. If the student blows too hard, the paper will "flap".
What I’m looking for is for the paper to rise to a certain
point and stay there without bouncing up and down. If
you’re really into interdisciplinary teaching, you can
explain the physics of the exercise and that it’s basically
what makes airplanes fly.
What is important with all of these exercises
is that the teacher stress keeping the formation of the
embouchure intact and constantly questioning students as to what
they are feeling physically as they perform the exercise. Have
them put a free hand on their abdomen and feel the tension of the
muscles as they blow up the balloon or hold the paper against the
stand. They will notice that with the long strip of paper being
held in position, they are not blowing anywhere near as hard but
the tension in the abdomen is still there. This will help them
begin to understand the difference between the speed of the air
and the volume of air. Holding the paper against the stand is
akin to playing loud and holding the long strip of paper in
position without flapping is akin to playing soft.
Of course, none of these "fun things" will
replace long tone exercises as the fundamental tone development
exercise. As I said earlier, I use the "F Concert" scale
descending as a long tone exercise for beginners. For
intermediate and advanced students (who know all the chromatic
fingerings), I use a tone development exercise from
Rascher’s "Top Tones", which is a series of three note
patterns descending chromatically.
In a full band setting, I have everyone start
on "F Concert" rather than on Rascher’s beginning note of
"Ab Concert" for alto sax. For brass players, we use the long
tone portion of the "Remington Warm-Up" as published by Emory
Remington, the famous trombone player. My advanced band begins
each rehearsal with these exercises and yes, we do the brass and
the woodwind exercises at the same time, along with one
I’ve developed for stick control with percussion.
It’s a bit confusing at first but you must realize that the
different instruments must work on different things. I could use
one exercise for all but each of these is based upon a 2 measure
pattern in 4/4 time so it’s not that confusing. The brasses
finish their warm up with 2 measure lip slur patterns as the
woodwinds work to the lowest and highest notes on their
instruments. This leaves us with the final aspect of tone
production... "What do you want to sound like?"
The mental part of tone production. This
aspect of tone production has been stressed by good teachers for
many, many years. A good friend of mine once said that he learned
more about tone production from hearing his teacher play than
anything else. While I doubt that’s entirely true, there is
a great deal to be said for emulating a quality sound. I really
believe that, once the sound is "in your head", it will
eventually come out of the instrument. I think that it is
important for a teacher to play with students and for students. I
think that it’s imperative that the teacher be able to
produce a good, characteristic tone quality on each instrument
that he/she teaches. You don’t have to be an artist on each
one, just be able to demonstrate a good sound. Just as a picture
is worth a thousand words, so is a good example of sound. It
doesn’t matter that you’re not a brass player or that
you play percussion. I believe that any good musician can learn
to produce a good characteristic sound on every instrument. This
is an area where we must lead by example. If they don’t try
to sound like you, then who will they try to sound like?
The importance of listening cannot be over
emphasized. Make students aware of artists on their instrument by
playing recordings of soloists. Be prepared to tell them where
they can purchase these recordings. Since I don’t allow
beginners to play until we are all playing as a group, I often
have recordings playing as the students enter the room and get
their instruments. Of course, there’s no way of knowing
just how effective this is but it cannot hurt for young students
to recognize the names Don Sinta, Fred Hemke, Wynton Marsalis,
Paul Desmond, James Galway, Larry Combs, Phil Woods, Bill
Watrous, etc. We all learn by emulation.
One of the gifts a teacher can give a student
is good things to copy. This can be especially difficult on the
saxophone as tones can vary greatly from one artist to another
and a tone that will get "rave reviews" in a jazz setting will
get you "ripped apart" in a concert setting. Someone once said
that the saxophone and the alto clarinet have no characteristic
tone quality. I’m not so sure about the alto clarinet, but
I do believe that the saxophone does have one and it’s up
to the teacher to help the student find it.
Equipment. Much has been written on
instrument and mouthpiece/reed/ligature selection. While it is
very important, I think that the mental and physical aspects of
tone production are more of a factor. Until the embouchure is
strong and correctly formed, the air is leaving the mouth at the
proper speed, and a concept of sound is developing, changes of
equipment will not always help the student. I believe that
beginners should begin with a medium tip opening, a ligature that
works, and a reed that is stiff enough to require a good
embouchure. If it’s too easy to produce a sound, the
necessary strength in the embouchure will not develop. I
generally start with #2 1/2 reeds and move to #3 as quickly as
possible. As a practical matter, I tend to use inexpensive reeds
with beginners. They break many and the necessary reed strength
changes quickly as strength develops. The second or third year is
soon enough to "move up" to premium reeds. I try to start
beginners on the best equipment they can afford. I try to explain
to parents the differences between the various price ranges.
It’s like painting your house. If you want to do it every
other year, then buy cheap paint. You do get what you pay for. I
discourage "no name" brands but I don’t think I’ll
ever be able to eliminate them entirely.
Whatever the instrument/mouthpiece, it is
imperative that it be in good working condition. An instrument
that doesn’t work properly not only impairs instruction,
but it is very frustrating for the student. Keep disinfectant
spray around and be prepared to play students’ instruments
from time to time. Examine their mouthpiece for chips when
excessive squeaking occurs. You need to know if the problem is
the student or the instrument. For beginners, the instrument
should also be rugged. Since moving to middle school from high
school several years ago, I have seen more instruments "hit the
floor" in one week than in 24 years of more advanced
instruction.
In closing, I suppose I should mention that,
in my beginning band classes, I do not start any students on the
saxophone. All saxophone "wanna bees" start on clarinet and must
spend at least one year on the instrument before making the
switch. There is always some resistance and I will accept a
student who moves in already playing saxophone but, once my
reasoning is explained to parents, there are few problems. I have
many reasons for doing this and most of you probably understand
them. I look at the "gift of doubling" as an extra benefit.
I’ll list a few of the reasons for those who may
wonder.
1. After the student learns to "cross the break", the fingerings for the woodwinds transfer easily from one
to another with only small differences. It does normally take a year on the clarinet to become comfortable above the break.
2. The saxophone is, far and away, the most expensive of all the beginner instruments with the rental and/or
actual cost being generally twice that of a good beginner clarinet. This is a factor appreciated by parents who are
concerned that their child may lose interest and they’ll be "stuck". As you all know, there has been a flood of very cheap
saxophones on the market. I have to remind parents that their poor construction and musical performance does not make them a good value.
3. As many can testify, the switch from clarinet to saxophone is usually a matter of days whereas the
switch from saxophone to clarinet is usually a matter of months.
4. An added benefit is that this method gives
me some manner of control over the instrumentation of the group.
I can exercise further control since I do happen to own several
altos and tenors for student use.
In my private studio, I do start beginner
saxophones and work with beginning saxophones from other teachers
in my area. For what it’s worth, I don’t start any
drummers either... but that’s another story, for another
time. David Hollingsworth
|